Laserfiche WebLink
FF- <br />NOV 27 1990 BOOK PAGE <br />TO: James Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />DIV N HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />' � c <br />ft6bert 14. Keating," <br />eating, AIC;ire:ctor Community Development <br />THRU: Roland M. DeBlois, AICP <br />Chief, Environmental Planning & <br />Code Enforcement <br />i <br />FROM: Charles W. HeathAhJ.4 <br />Code Enforcement Officer <br />DATE: November 16, 1990 <br />RE: PUBLIC NUISANCE VIOLATION - FREEMAN DOYLE - OSLO PARK <br />SUBDIVISION UNIT NO. 2B, LOT 11, BLOCK F, ACCORDING TO <br />THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 24 OF <br />THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular <br />meeting of November 27, 1990. <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />On March 7, 1990, Code Enforcement staff sent a Notice of Public <br />Nuisance to Freeman Doyle, concerning the overgrown weed condition <br />and/or junk, trash, and debris accumulation on his/her property in <br />Oslo Park Unit 2B. The Respondent was cited as maintaining the <br />property in violation of Chapter 973 of the County Land Development <br />Code, which prohibits the accumulation of weeds in excess of 18 <br />inches in height within a platted recorded subdivision (where lots <br />are at a minimum of 50% developed). Chapter 973 also prohibits the <br />accumulation of junk, trash, and debris on property, except at <br />approved solid waste disposal facilities or approved salvage yards. <br />The subject property was posted as set forth in Section 973.09 of <br />the County Code, and the Respondent was given thirty (30) days to <br />abate the nuisance. <br />The nuisance violation was not abated within the required thirty <br />(30) day time period. Therefore, in accordance with Section <br />973.04(2), County Code, County Personnel (the Road & Bridge <br />Division) cleared the nuisance violation, with costs to be assessed <br />against the property owner(s). <br />Section 973.06(1) of the County Code requires that the cost of a <br />county nuisance abatement shall be calculated and reported to the <br />County Commissioners, who, by resolution, shall assess such costs <br />against the subject property. This matter is presented herein to <br />the Board for consideration to adopt said resolution. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />Section 973.06(1), Public Nuisances, of the Indian River Land <br />Development Code specifically reads as follows: <br />"After abatement of a nuisance by the <br />to the county as to each lot, parcel <br />calculated and reported to the Board <br />by resolution, shall assess such <br />22 <br />county, the cost thereof <br />or tract of land shall be <br />of County Commissioners, <br />costs against such lot, <br />