Laserfiche WebLink
Under discussion, Commissioner Wheeler stated that he would <br />vote against the Motion because he believed it would be setting a <br />precedent where everytime somebody comes in and wants to pull a <br />building permit, we would have to find out what kind of a sign <br />they intend to put up and endorse something in writing before <br />they get to the construction phase. He believed it is a separate <br />issue which should be handled separately. <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed that if this had not been an <br />emergency item, that could have been worked out ahead of time. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion <br />failed by a 1-4 vote, with Commissioners Eggert, Bird, <br />Bowman and Wheeler dissenting. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved <br />staff's recommendation and adopted Resolution 90-182, <br />abandoning certain easements in a 20,300 square foot <br />portion of the Plaza at Vero Subdivision known as <br />Parcel #1, according to the plat thereof as recorded in <br />Plat Book 12, Page 19, of the public records of Indian <br />River County, Florida. <br />Commissioner Scurlock stated that he voted for the Motion <br />because he felt his former Motion expressed his concerns about <br />the neon lights issue. <br />Chairman Eggert asked if the Board wished to direct the <br />planning staff to readdress the neon light restrictions. <br />Commissioner Bird felt we should wait until we see how our <br />ordinance works with this particular case, and the Board indicated <br />their agreement. <br />47 <br />BOOK I <br />A <br />