My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/11/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
12/11/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:47 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:02:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/11/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 8? N, UH 24 <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - BETTY F. McCRAE ET AL REQUEST TO <br />AMEND THE COMP PLAN ±6.8 ACRES AND REZONE ±4.3 ACRES (Postponed <br />from earlier in this meeting) <br />Chairman Eggert was concerned about the domino effect in <br />going to CL (Light Commercial), because even with CL, that <br />property could be sold to Wal-Mart and become a parking lot. <br />Attorney Dill advised that he had conferred with his clients <br />and while they really prefer Commercial, they realize the Board's <br />concerns and have agreed to amend their request from CG (General <br />Commercial) to CL (Light Commercial), which is a limited <br />commercial use. <br />Bill Nelson, 230 14th Street, raised the issue of access to <br />Indian River Boulevard along that stretch, and Commissioner <br />Scurlock recalled that the County acquired some right-of-way <br />along that property and an agreement was reached whereby that <br />property and the property to the north would share an access to <br />Indian River Boulevard. <br />Attorney Vitunac confirmed that the agreement states that <br />the two existing houses on those properties have to share an <br />access to the Boulevard. <br />Attorney Dill asked for clarification on the access to his <br />clients' property, and Commissioner Scurlock further explained <br />that the agreement reached through negotiation on the <br />right-of-way acquisition was that it guaranteed them access to <br />the two properties, the subject property and the property to the <br />north, and whether there is one person or 100 people there, they <br />have access. <br />Attorney Dill understood then that if they have a <br />predetermined access location, whatever use goes on the property <br />will have to coordinate through that access. <br />Commissioner Bird felt we will cross that bridge when we <br />come to it, and Attorney Dill agreed. <br />There being no others who wished to be heard, the Chairman <br />closed the Public Hearing. <br />122 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.