My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/11/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
12/11/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:47 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:02:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/11/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Scurlock asked if we aren't already on the <br />record as to what our recommendation was, and Commissioner Bird <br />felt this is just to reiterate our position and stress that the <br />majority of the Commission still feels the same as before. <br />Commissioner Scurlock wished to know, if the signs are up, <br />if anyone has checked on how it is working and whether there have <br />been complaints. He felt this would be something we should <br />pursue. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if Commissioner Bowman was correct <br />that the whole proposed 20 mph corridor would be in Brevard <br />County. He did not think that was right. <br />Planner DeBlois stated the the 20 mph corridor is clearly in <br />the Indian River County portion. <br />Commissioner Bowman clarified that what she said was that <br />the traveled way between the 2 bridges (the highway bridge and <br />the railroad bridge) is all in Brevard County. <br />Several Commission members indicated they were not sure that <br />is correct, and Commissioner Bird believed that all we are asking <br />is to send the letter to reaffirm the position of the majority of <br />the Commission. <br />Commissioner Bowman felt what it is saying is that this will <br />open the whole issue to public hearing when the rules are set for <br />this county. <br />Commissioner Scurlock did not see why everything wouldn't be <br />on the table at a public hearing. He felt that was the purpose <br />of a public hearing, and he did not like public hearings where <br />you limit the scope to talk about what you want to talk about and <br />avoid the things people have an interest in. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commis- <br />sioner Scurlock, Commissioner Bowman voting in <br />opposition, the Board by a 4 to 1 vote authorized the <br />Chairman to send a letter to the FDNR as recommended <br />by staff as it was felt we should reiterate our position. <br />C 11X990 , g BOOK, � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.