Laserfiche WebLink
the county is high due to its relatively large size, its <br />association with other complementary habitats, and its presently <br />undisturbed/unencroached status. Other xeric scrub areas in the <br />developing portion of Indian River County have been largely <br />isolated by urban development, are relatively small in size or are <br />not part of a bigger, diverse ecological system such as the St.. <br />Sebastian River area. Thus, the St. Sebastian River area xeric <br />scrub community has been given extra consideration in its <br />conservation designation. <br />Outside of - the St. Sebastian River conservation area, lands <br />designated as C-2 in the existing comprehensive plan are limited to <br />privately owned wetlands and islands associated with the Indian <br />River Lagoon. In such cases, a 1 unit/40 acre development density <br />with a 1 unit/acre density transfer credit is appropriate. <br />Wetlands are inherently not conducive for development based on <br />their environmentally sensitive characteristics. The low density <br />serves to deter development within the C-2 wetlands while still <br />providing relief via the density transfer credit. <br />The intent of the established 1 unit/40 --acre C-2 density was <br />primarily to provide needed protection to sensitive wetlands. In <br />reassessing the C-2 density as it applies to the scrub upland along <br />the St. Sebastian River, the appropriateness of the density <br />restriction is subject to scrutiny. Contrary to wetlands, xeric <br />scrub upland physical characteristics are highly conducive for land <br />development. The land is "high and dry" and, as such, xeric scrub <br />has been largely developed elsewhere in the county and in Florida <br />as a whole. Thus, the conflict of development vs. preservation is <br />greater than with wetlands. <br />An increase in the density allowance for the scrub uplands adjacent <br />to the St. Sebastian River, however, may be appropriate in striking <br />a reasonable balance between private development rights and public <br />preservation interest. <br />It is staff's position that the 1 unit/2J acre density as proposed <br />by the applicant is too substantial of a density increase for the <br />uplands of the St. Sebastian River conservation area, particularly <br />as it would apply to the west bank of the south fork. The area <br />west of the river is physically isolated from existing <br />infrastructure and access, and the proposed density would <br />substantially increase development pressure in the face of <br />conservation objectives. <br />A majority of the W.W. Ranch is agriculturally designated with a <br />density of 1 unit/5 acres. The original intent of the C-2 District <br />around the St. Sebastian River was to provide additional protection <br />for the environmentally significant areas than would be afforded to <br />the agriculturally designated lands. The applicant is proposing a <br />higher density (1 unit/2 1 acres) in the conservation area than when <br />the area was originally designated as agriculture (1 unit/5 acres). <br />A 1 unit/5 acre density would be more compatible with the adjacent, <br />similar density of agriculturally designated lands in the vicinity. <br />Moreover, the county would retain its percent set-aside purview <br />over created parcels within the conservation area. <br />The present C-2 designation does not allow agricultural use. The <br />purpose of the agricultural use exclusion is to prevent the <br />potential for unregulated conversion of the environmentally <br />significant St. Sebastian River area natural communities to grove <br />or pasture. Planning staff support the continued restriction on <br />agricultural use within the conservation area. <br />75 <br />BUUKF,1 �c J� L <br />