12/18/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'DEC 18 90 A BOOK 82 F-AGE.3-4 i Relocation and/or closing costs were not provided on some of the parcels. Corrected total. Master Plan contained $3,662,200. The total estimated project cost utilizing the $3,662,700 land acquisition cost is $19,277,006. The new total would be $18,967,402. In summary, the comparison of each of the concept project cost with the current land acquisition expense included is as follows: Land Total Acquisition Cost Project Cost Concept J $2,698,092 $18,362,691 Concept L $3,353,096 $18,967,402 Concept M $3,748,169 $19,457,768 / $19,578,649 The overall estimated project costs are conservative and as mentioned previously the site acquisition contingencies are also conservative. The appraisal of the current courthouse and state attorney sites reflect a total value of $1,175,000. The individual site values are as follows: $375,000, state attorney; $350,000, courthouse annex; and $450,000 courthouse. At the December 18 meeting, the preceding will be elaborated on, along with graphics. In addition, the appraisers Armfield and Napier will be present to address any specific questions concerning the appraisals. If a final determination is made concerning site and development concept, staff will immediately proceed with initiating the land acquisition process. Also scheduled for the December 18 meeting is our recommendation for implementation of the design and construction phases. The recommendation -is to utilize the program/ construction management approach. Upon approval of the specific approach, staff will immediately release the appropriate RFPs. Administrator Chandler assured the Board that staff has met with our appraisers, gone over this entire matter with them, and feels they have solid appraisals with which we can be extremely comfortable. Commissioner Bird asked if staff and the consultants feel that any of the 3 concepts could work and satisfy our needs and is the basic difference in the costs of acquiring additional land and displacing businesses. Administrator Chandler confirmed that any of the 3 would meet the need. From a staff perspective, they feel Concept L would work out very well. Concept M provides more than is needed, and they do not feel Concept J is as functional or that it will provide as much flexibility as the other 2. Staff, therefore, would recommend Concept L. Commissioner Scurlock noted that the Administrator suggested that Concept M has the most flexibility, and when we are talking 40