Laserfiche WebLink
JAW 22 1991 <br />�0: Members of the Board <br />of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Joseph A. Baird <br />OMB Director - q <br />BOOK F��E <br />SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT <br />NUMBER: 017 <br />DATE: January 9, 1991 <br />i <br />;OPTIONAL SALES TAX/ <br />i <br />!All Land ;315-106-519-066 11!$ 24,000 !$ 0 <br />i <br />!Reserve for Contingencies ;315-106-581-099.91;5 0 !$ 24,000 <br />i <br />! i i <br />SCHEDULING_ OF TWO NIGHT PUBLIC HEARINGS REQUIRED TO ADOPT LDR <br />AMENDMENTS <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/15/91: <br />TO: James Chandler <br />County Administrator �I <br />FROM: Robert M. Keating, AICP y` K <br />Community Development Director <br />DATE: January 15, 1991 <br />SUBJECT: BOARD MEETINGS <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the board of county commissioners at its regular <br />meeting of January 22, 1991. <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS <br />During its 1990 session, the Florida Legislature made several <br />changes to local government planning requirements. One such change <br />which became effective on October -1,-1990 requires two night <br />meetings of the board of county commissioners whenever changes to <br />the county's land development regulations (LDR's) are to be <br />approved. <br />For that reason, staff has refrained from proposing a number of <br />minor LDR changes and corrections which are necessary to address <br />oversights in the newly adopted land development regulations. <br />Recently, however, Bruce Barkett submitted a privately initiated <br />LDR _text amendment for a client. Since that amendment request, <br />itself, will require two night meetings of the board, the staff has <br />opted to "piggyback" its minor LDR amendments with the Barkett <br />amendment. In that way the board can address all of the amendments <br />in just one set of night meetings. <br />When the board adopted the new LDR's in September, it was <br />recognized that there would probably need to be minor revisions to <br />clean up minor problems that were certain to arise. As part of its <br />adoption motion, the board authorized staff to bring such <br />amendments back for consideration. To proceed with this process, _ <br />the board must now set dates and times for the two required <br />hearings. <br />12 <br />