Laserfiche WebLink
FEB 12 1991 <br />FOOK FAE 645 <br />TO: James E. Chandler, <br />County Administrator <br />THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., ,g <br />Public Works Director <br />FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E.,�_,.�a,'r <br />Capital Projects Manager <br />SUBJECT: Public Hearing for South Beach <br />Recreation Path <br />DATE: February 5, 1991 FILE: path.agn <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />On December 18, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners. <br />adopted Resolution NO. 90-189 providing for a recreation path <br />on the west side of AlA from the south City Limits of Vero <br />Beach to the south Moorings line (Spyglass Lane). On the same <br />date, the Board adopted Resolution NO. 90-190 setting the date <br />and time for a Public Hearing to discuss the advisability, <br />cost and amount of the assessment against each property. This <br />hearing is scheduled February 12, 1991 at 9:05 AM. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING <br />After hearing complaints and input at the Public Hearing and <br />if necessary, making any adjustments to the assessment roll, <br />it is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners <br />approve the attached Resolution confirming the assessment <br />roll. If adjustments or changes are made a new resolution will <br />be brought before the Board of County Commissioners for <br />approval. <br />Ms. Thompson informed the Board that 2100 notices of this <br />hearing have been sent out. They have received letters from 11 <br />residents in favor of the project and 12 opposing it and she <br />believed more have been received since that count. <br />Chairman Bird said other letters had been received and the <br />figures modified to 15 opposed to the project and 11 in favor of <br />it. <br />Said letters are on file in the Office of Clerk to the Board. <br />Commissioner Eggert inquired about the percentage on the <br />petitions for the project and Public Works Director Davis felt that <br />quite a few people who were involved in the petition process are <br />present and can comment on the number received. It was his <br />understanding that it was at least 50%. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if the $145 assessment is a not - <br />to -exceed figure, and Director Davis said it is and added there is <br />a 10% contingency in the project. <br />Commissioner Scurlock had a number of questions. He asked <br />about the closest proximity of the bike and walking path to AlA and <br />20 <br />