My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/5/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
3/5/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:08 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:11:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/05/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
} <br />BOOK � & FMU <br />Commissioner Scurlock understood that staff's biggest <br />objection is that construction costs exceeded our normal con- <br />struction costs and 250 of that is a larger number than what we <br />usually pay. <br />Commissioner Wheeler asked if any consideration had been <br />given to paying the 25% since the road needed to be paved in any <br />case, and they went ahead and paved it before it would have been <br />paved under the petition paving program. <br />Director Davis explained that staff did consider that <br />alternative. The main objection was due to the adverse effect it <br />would have on our petition paving program. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked what the average cost would�be <br />for the size of this project, and Director Davis believed it <br />would run around $35 per lineal foot. The ones where we have <br />been estimating it at $50 per lineal foot are the ones where we <br />anticipate bidding the work out to the private sector. However, <br />if County crews did it, he believed $35 per lineal foot would be <br />a fair cost, and that would have to be multiplied by 25% for the <br />County's share. <br />Adam Berlin, 514 Bay Drive, Vero Beach, came to the podium, <br />and Chairman Bird explained that the third option just identified <br />would be to reimburse him for 250 of the cost figured at $35 a <br />lineal foot. <br />Mir. Berlin noted that he is here today because of this third <br />option that wasn't set out in staff's recommendation. He <br />believed there was a dialogue problem with the Planning <br />Department right from the beginning when they brought in their <br />site plan, but what he is saying now is that he will go ahead and <br />pay for the other people on the street. He doesn't want to go <br />through the petition process; he just would pay their fair share. <br />He asked if the cost of $35-$50 per lineal foot includes <br />drainage. <br />Director Davis advised that it includes the cost for paving <br />and drainage,, but believed that the County moved some trees out <br />32 <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.