Laserfiche WebLink
of the way there also. The $50 is the high figure we use if we <br />put it out to bid in the private sector, and the $35 is a typical <br />cost if the County crews do the work. If we multiply the $35 a <br />lineal foot by 250, the amount is $4,375, and if the County <br />wanted to participate, he wouldn't recommend more than that. <br />Commissioner Wheeler was sure the County saved some funds in <br />office staff, etc., by not having to go through the public <br />hearing process for petition paving, and suggested that in the <br />spirit of fairness we pay the 25%. <br />Commissioner Bowman believed we would be setting a very <br />dangerous precedent, but Commissioner Wheeler didn't feel we <br />would since the road needed to be paved and the Board has always <br />encouraged road paving. He believed it would be fair to pay 250 <br />since that has been our policy. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, that the County pay 25% of the <br />actual paving costs. <br />Commissioner Scurlock agreed with Corrmissioner Bowman that <br />we would be setting a precedent because there are a lot of <br />developers out there who have to pay for paving before they can <br />get their site plan approved or their C.O. issued. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked if the road needed to be paved if <br />this development had not gone in, and Director Davis stated that <br />it did. <br />Chairman Bird stated that he would feel better about the <br />Motion if we paid 25% of what the cost would have been had a <br />County crew done the work. <br />COMMISSIONER WHEELER amended his Motion to <br />authorize County reimbursement of $4,375, which <br />is 250 of the paving cost at $35 a lineal foot. <br />CHAIRMAN BIRD SECONDED THE MOTION. <br />np�,K 8 ? F',1`'� �r .� <br />HA 199 3 3 ,c <br />L <br />