My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/5/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
3/5/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:08 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:11:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/05/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAR <br />FacE <br />afraid that they will <br />be forced to hook up under our <br />ordinance. <br />The ordinance does not say that. Capacity is not available. <br />Mandatory collection is mentioned in our ordinance only because <br />of our bond company, and it says if you provide capacity to <br />people and they pay for it, they have to hook up. <br />Chairman Bird asked if there are some commercial estab- <br />lishments where it is mandatory that they hook up, such as a <br />restaurant, and Commissioner Scurlock noted, for example, that <br />there is a restaurant in Sebastian that was denied expansion of <br />their business because the septic tank was not acceptable. <br />Whether we had our system there or not, they would not be allowed <br />to put a septic tank in. <br />Commissioner Wheeler understood that any business having a <br />pipe running in front of the property has to hook up when they <br />come in to pull a permit for something. It's mandatory that you <br />hook up or you don't get the permit. <br />Attorney Vitunac pointed out that is a State health law <br />requirement, not a County Utilities' requirement. However, they <br />can only hook up if there is capacity to hook up. The Health <br />Department cannot force Utilities to let them hook into the line. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that many people in the north <br />county are under the mistaken impression that somehow somebody <br />has decided that they will be put on the system in the entire <br />service area within the corporate limits, which is basically from <br />the river up to U.S. #1, and that everybody in that area is going <br />to be charged $.18 a square foot. That is not the case, and <br />actually it would be his recommendation not to do that. He <br />preferred that we follow the same voluntary assessment process we <br />did on SR -60. In any event, he felt the solution is that the <br />destiny of Sebastian should be in the hands of the City Council <br />of Sebastian. It would be his recommendation that the County <br />formally indicate to them that this Commission's policy is that <br />if they wish to remove themselves from that service area and <br />61 <br />;I I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.