My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/12/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
3/12/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:08 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:11:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/12/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAR 12 1991 <br />ROOK P°:'jE JI 1, <br />money you could have left in the bank, and consequently this is a <br />real cost to the County; it needs to be covered someplace; and we <br />are suggesting it be done through impact fees as opposed to rates. <br />Romeo Dorsey from Heron Cay came before the Board and revealed <br />that Florida sets their impact fees much different than up north. <br />He asked Mr. Hutchinson whether he made a cost study of these <br />services on county water and sewer. Mr. Hutchinson said, <br />"Yes, sir." <br />Mr. Dorsey asked if a specific line was put out to a big <br />development, how would it be handled and why couldn't they be given <br />a deferred charge and when the property is developed, then collect <br />the money. He also questioned why the County wants impact fees. <br />He assumed that the County goes to bonding for a facility or to <br />enlarge a sewer plant or water treatment plant. If something is <br />going to last 25 or 50 yearsJhe did not see why one person should <br />have to pay if they use it for only five years. He felt the cost <br />should be covered by the rates. <br />Commissioner Scurlock agreed we could do that but the rate <br />would be a hundred dollars a month. <br />Mr. Dorsey still felt that rates would cover what is used, not <br />something they are not going to use. He then questioned the <br />increase in the impact fee from the current fee, $1,294, to the <br />1993 fee of $1,570. He agreed he should pay interest to the <br />County, perhaps six percent, or five percent, but he felt the <br />increase was too steep. <br />Mr. Dorsey asked about ownership of the meter and if he paid <br />for the meter, when he leaves, can he pick it up and take it. <br />Commissioner Scurlock said he would get his deposit back. <br />Director Pinto explained after the homeowner pays for the <br />meter it becomes an asset of the property; however, maintenance and <br />replacement is the responsibility of the County. <br />Mr. Dorsey thought the cost of the meter could also be covered <br />in the rates. <br />Mr. Hutchinson addressed the points raised by Mr. Dorsey. He <br />explained the increase in impact fees is because construction costs <br />are rising and the cost of providing capacity is going up every <br />year. In addition, the County's costs for carrying the capacity <br />over a period of time need to be collected. <br />Mr. Hutchinson further explained that the impact fee is a one- <br />time fee to cover the useful life of the facility, which is, <br />perhaps, 25 years or, in some cases, 50 years and even though you <br />may not use the facility for that length of time the fact that it <br />is paid, it becomes an asset of the property. <br />46 <br />W <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.