My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/7/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
5/7/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:09 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:18:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/07/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAY 7 <br />NOOK: P,1,E <br />Impacts on Surrounding Uses and Consistency with Comprehensive Plan <br />The proposed rezoning represents a negligible increase in density, <br />and compatibility is not a major concern for this property. The <br />applicant intends to develop the properties north and east of the <br />parcel as multiple -family dwellings and plans to use the park tract <br />as part of the development. The development to the west and south <br />.of the property is likely to be general commercial. Since multi- <br />family developments undergo either site plan or PRD review, <br />specific buffering would be addressed at that time. <br />A"'review of this rezoning with the future land use map and <br />policies, as well as the policies of the other plan elements, does <br />-not reveal any inconsistency. Policy 1.14 of the Future Land Use <br />:Element allows multiple -family development at.10 units/acre in <br />-Medium-Density Residential areas. The rezoning would further the <br />.housing element objectives of providing a diversity of housing <br />:types and densities. <br />In addition to.a review of compatibility with surrounding uses and <br />consistency with the comprehensive plan, environmental impacts of <br />.the proposed change are also reviewed. <br />There are no significant impacts on environmental quality for this <br />-property. <br />Conclusion <br />subject property is located in a land use area designated for <br />Multiple -Family Residential development. With its designation as <br />a park tract, it is evident that the property was never intended to <br />!be located within the U.S. #1 (Vero Beach to South Relief Canal) <br />-Commercial corridor. Further evidence of this is indicated by the <br />parcel size. Since the parcel is less than 5,500 square feet in <br />size, it could not effectively be developed commercially. <br />The owner of the park parcel is also the owner of Sunshine Quality <br />Homes Subdivision, Unit II. It is the owner's intent to combine <br />the properties and develop multiple -family housing. A zoning <br />designation of RM -10 would facilitate this type of development and <br />reflect the land use designation of M-2. Thus the proposed change <br />in zoning would be consistent with county policies and existing <br />land uses. <br />Recommendation <br />Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of <br />County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject <br />j property to RM -10. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he closed the <br />public hearing. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted <br />Ordinance 91-15 amending the Zoning Ordinance and <br />accompanying zoning map from CG to RM -10 for the <br />property located east of U.S. 1 and North of 14th <br />Street and described herein. <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.