My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/15/2011 (4)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2011
>
03/15/2011 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2018 2:11:31 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 8:36:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
03/15/2011
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL000008\S0002II.tif
SmeadsoftID
11228
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />( Agenda Item For 03-15-2011 BCC Meeting <br />Sector 3 Beach Restoration — Change Order #4 <br />March 8, 2011 <br />The proposed Change Order #4 increases the unit cost of all sand required to complete <br />Phase 2 of the project from $15.66 to $16.74 per cubic yard, and consequently increases <br />the total contract price from $10,319,234 to $10,622,714. This is based on a total <br />volume of 281,000 cubic yards remaining to complete Phase 2. <br />ANALYSIS AND ALTERNATIVES <br />Staff evaluated Change order #4 and determined that Ranger is correct in their <br />assertion that fuel prices have increased since the project began. If a fuel -related <br />change order were to be granted however, staff does not agree that the baseline for <br />calculating a fuel increase is the contact bid date of August 3, 2009. Staff feels that the <br />baseline date should be March 23, 2010. Since Ranger agreed at the 03-23-2010 Board <br />meeting to freeze the unit cost of sand at $15.66 per cubic yard, any fuel -related price <br />increases (if granted by the County) should be calculated from 03-23-2010 forward. <br />Another important issue to consider is that during the discussion leading up to the <br />approval of Change Orders #1 and #2 on 03-23-2010, staff calculated that the County <br />was owed a credit because Ranger was going to save over $500,000 in transportation <br />costs. The savings were due to 90% of the material coming from the Ranch Road Lake <br />mine instead of equal shares coming from the Ranch Road. Lake, Fischer 86th and Nick <br />Stewart mines. The Ranch Road Lake mine is only nine (9) miles from the beach <br />compared to the more -distant Fischer 86th and Nick Stewart mines, which are 17 miles <br />and 23 miles, respectively, from the beach. Ranger balked at the $500,000 figure, saying <br />that the credit due to the County was closer to $111,000. Later on 03-23-2010, when <br />Change Orders #1 and #2 were approved by the Board, zero credit was given to the <br />County. This was despite the fact that Ranger acknowledged a substantial reduction in <br />transportation expenses incurred throughout the project. <br />Staff offers the following three alternatives ... <br />Alternative 1• <br />Approve 100% of Ranger's proposed Change Order.#4, corresponding to the increase in <br />fuel cost from August, 2009 to the present. This would increase the total contract price <br />by $303,480, from $10,319,234 to $10,622,714. Approving 100% of Change Order #4 <br />increases the unit cost of all sand required to complete Phase 2 of the project by $1.08 <br />per cubic yard, from $15.66 to $16.74 per cubic yard. <br />F:\Public Works\CRM\My Documents\Coastal\Beach Sector 3 Change Order #4 BCC 03-15-2011.docx <br />117 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.