Laserfiche WebLink
whatever makes it an equivalent value to the First Street site. <br />He further noted that while the State has indicated their <br />approval, this exchange still has to be approved by the federal <br />people. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Bowman, Commissioners Eggert and Wheeler <br />voting in opposition, the Board by a 3 to 2 vote <br />approved Option 1 scaling the acreage down to 15 <br />ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES - COURTHOUSE PROJECT <br />The Board reviewed memo from General Services Director Dean: <br />DATE: MAY 21 1991 <br />TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />;;:;FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTOR <br />DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERV <br />...'..-SUBJECT: ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE PROJECT <br />BACKGROUND: <br />As authorized at their regular meeting on April 161* 1991, staff <br />negotiated a.contract with Pierce, Goodwin, Alexander, and Linville <br />;:to perform Architectural and Engineering Services for the Courthouse <br />.`•'.Project. This was the number one firm on the short list. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />,,.::.The following is a break down of cost associated with the contract: <br />-"Basic Services, Lump Sum $776,000.00 <br />Interior Design, Lump Sum 50.000.00 <br />SUBTOTAL <br />:,.Reimbursable.(not to exceed) <br />Surveying <br />`Traffic Study <br />Concurrency -Certificate <br />Upgrade Program <br />SUBTOTAL <br />GRAND TOTAL <br />$826,000.00 <br />$ 8,148.00 <br />23,250.00 <br />3,075.00 <br />20,000.00 <br />$ 77,465.00 <br />$903,465.00 <br />We had budgeted $1,012,884.00 for these services. This contract <br />represents a savings of $109,419 on that budget. '• <br />RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />Staff recommends approval of the contract and requests authorization <br />for the Chairman to execute the documents. <br />39 <br />BOOK <br />