Laserfiche WebLink
attorney Bruce Barkett [LDRA-13-12-01 / 201309005 -714801 <br />[Legislative] <br />Mr. Boling reviewed the information contained in his memorandum dated <br />November 1, 2013 and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of whicl are on <br />file in the Commission Office. He concluded with staff's recommendatior that the <br />PZC recommend that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) adopt the <br />proposed ordinance to allow drive-through and drive -up facilities in Mi ed Use <br />PDs. <br />Mr. Rednour asked how far the residential property had to be froa drive- <br />through. <br />Mr. Boling responded staff did not propose a particular dista ce and <br />thought it might depend on the type of residential property and any buffering that <br />may be between it and the drive-through; so it would be design based depending <br />on where the residential buildings were. <br />Vice -Chairman Brognano opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. and since <br />no one wished to speak, the public hearing was closed. <br />ON MOTION BY Mr. Rednour, SECONDED BY Mr. <br />- Stewart, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to <br />approve staff's recommendation. <br />Vice -Chairman Brognano read the following into the record: <br />B. Consideration of Amendments to Land D"opment Re <br />ulations <br />(LDRs) Chapter 911, Zoning; C apter 912, Sin <br />le -family <br />Development; and Chapter 974,Ise and Vibration Control, <br />to <br />Regulate the Location and So ndMitigation of Outdoor Mechanical <br />Equipment in Planned D elopments and Small -lot Su <br />divisions <br />with Reduced Setbacks to Minimize Potenti <br />I Noise <br />;Yar <br />Disturbance to Acent Properties. County -initiated. [Legi <br />lative] <br />Mr. Roland De bis, IRC Chief of Environmental Planning a d Code <br />Enforcement, revi ed the information contained in his memorandu dated <br />November 5, M3 and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of whi h are on <br />file in theC mission Office. He mentioned the Code Enforcement cas dealing <br />with thicAlssue had been resolved because the Respondent had agree to keep <br />his tdoor electric pool heater off while he was out of the country and would not <br />rn it on when he returned until appropriate mitigation measures were te ken. <br />PZC/Unapproved 4 Novemb r 14, 2013 <br />F:\BCCWII Committees\P&Z\2013 — AGENDAS & MINUTES\P&Z-11-14-13.doc <br />144 <br />