My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/10/2013AP
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
12/10/2013AP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 11:05:31 AM
Creation date
3/23/2016 9:06:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
12/10/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
216
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000G\S0004NX.tif
SmeadsoftID
14238
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dylan Reingold, County Attomey <br />William K DeBiaA Deputy County Attorney <br />ATTORNEY'S MATTERS: <br />Ofi ce Df <br />INDIAN RIVER CO <br />MEMORANDUM <br />ATTO <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners <br />ol�_ <br />FROM: William K. DeBraal — Deputy County Attomey <br />THROUGH: Dylan Reingold — County Attorney <br />DATE: August 7, 2013 <br />SUBJECT: Developer Request for Additional 2 -Year Extension to Construct Required Sidewa <br />Improvements <br />There are currently seven subdivisions (Millstone Landing, Phase 3; Provence Bay; Vero Lago, Ph ses 1, <br />2, 3 and 5; -and Isles at Waterway Village PD Plat 1C) that are operating under the sidewalk bondi g -out <br />regulations that were in effect prior to 2009 where the developer is responsible for the construction of <br />the sidewalk segments fronting or contiguous to individual lots. Funds currently held by the County for <br />sidewalk guarantees for these subdivisions total $311,730.39. Ordinance No. 2012-018, adopted by the <br />Board in June of 2012, amended Section 913.09(5) to allow developers to amend the restrictive <br />covenants (if the developer still had control of the subdivision) to make it the responsibility of the lot <br />owner prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy on the residence, to construct, at the lot owner's <br />expense, the sidewalk segment fronting or contiguous to the lot owner's lot provided that the consent <br />of the lot owner and any mortgagee be obtained. Additionally, the consent would also need to be <br />obtained from any existing lot owner if the sidewalk segments not built are within the exist ng lot <br />owner's property line and the entrance to the subdivision, as the existing lot owner under the former <br />code is guaranteed sidewalk continuity by the developer from his lot to the subdivision entrant . If a <br />developer were able to accomplish this, then the posted security was able to be released and re urned <br />to the developer. <br />Obtaining consents of lot owners and their mortgagees have proven to be quite challenging, and in <br />some instances impossible. Thus these developers continue to have in place the sidewalk s curity <br />guaranteeing the construction of the sidewalk segments. In June of 2012, the Board also amend d the <br />,LVED FOR <br />01 �L._..._, Z l i_p2i t <br />3.C.C. MEETING - REGU ENDA <br />8-13 4 <br />173 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.