My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/21/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
5/21/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:09 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:21:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/21/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAY 2 1 �9 <br />BOOK N I I GE 41 <br />In this case the maximum area of impervious surface for the <br />proposed request will be approximately 11,220 square feet. The <br />estimated maximum run-off volume, based upon the amount of <br />impervious surface, will be 9,845 cubic feet. In order to maintain <br />the adopted level of service, development of the site must include <br />retention of at least 8,837 cubic feet of run-off, the difference <br />betdition which <br />wapplicant can meetpost-development <br />i on site, drainage level of service theservice will <br />be met. <br />- Recreation <br />Recreation concurrency requirements apply only to residential <br />development. Therefore, this comprehensive plana menion mentconrequest <br />would not be required to satisfy any <br />urrency <br />requirements. <br />Imvacts on Surrounding Uses and Environmental Quality <br />The potential impact of the subject request upon surrounding land <br />uses is an important issue concerning this property. The subject <br />property is located adjacent to the Ridge Acres Subdivision and to <br />�unplatted lots with single-family homes. Ridge Acres is a single <br />family residential community with homes on both sides of the <br />;:unpaved 10th Avenue. <br />.A land use .change for the subject property would have a number of <br />"'negative impacts upon the sin , the first <br />gle-family residences in the area <br />`If the property were developed with commercial uses <br />roperty owners would be a lack of <br />";negative impact upon surrounding p <br />compatibility between the single-family development and the subject <br />property, itself. <br />Given. the type of -uses allowed by a commercial land use <br />designation, there is no question that redesignation of the subject <br />property for commercial development would not be compatible with <br />the adjacent single family homes. While the land use to the north <br />and east is commercial/industrial, these sites are separated by 9th <br />Street and -Old Dixie Highway. That provides physical separation <br />and some buffering. Generally, residential sites must be buffered <br />from adjacent commercial and industrial uses to ensure <br />compatibility; with the subject request, however, the small size of <br />the property precludes adequate buffering between the commercial <br />uses that would be established on the site and the adjacent single- <br />family homes. <br />The second negative impact from the proposed land use amendment <br />involves more than the property itself; it relates to the entire <br />area south. of the subject property along Old Dixie Highway. The <br />entire area would be affected because a change in land use <br />designation for commercial development on the subject property <br />would provide an impetus for other property owners to submit <br />comprehensive plan amendment requests for a commercial/ industrial <br />designation. <br />The result of this would be a domino' effect, with <br />commercial/ industrial designation all along Old Dixie. As a <br />result, compatibility problems would develop with other parcels to <br />the south of the subject property and west of Old Dixie Highway. <br />The parcels from 9th Street to 8th Street adjacent to Old Dixie <br />Highway. are immediately susceptible to the domino effect. The <br />subject property's land use change would prompt these property <br />owners to request land use changes, and the first domino would <br />fall. The residents of Ridge Acres along the east side of 10th <br />Avenue would be adjacent to commercial development. This would act <br />as an intrusion into the neighborhood quality of life. <br />The third negative impact from the proposed land use amendment <br />involves the nuisance created by commercial traffic generation. <br />Staff feels that a change in the land use designation and zoning of <br />the subject property will increase traffic flow through the Ridge <br />Acres Subdivision via 10th Avenue. Staff foresees that, if <br />38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.