My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/11/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
6/11/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:09 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:26:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/11/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUN It 1991 <br />I <br />aom, 8J,P� <br />�f <br />i� <br />, <br />;EL <br />Commissioner Eggert noted that she got the idea this was a <br />proposal by Save Our Shores, and that proposal was accepted, but <br />Mr. Morrison reiterated that it was accepted subject to the <br />criteria. What is submitted today all focuses on the beach, and <br />we need information on other things as well. <br />Commissioner Scurlock agreed we must study all the aspects <br />of tourism, and possibly we may find that baseball is a lot.more <br />important than beaches. He felt we must determine this and let <br />the chips fall where they may. <br />Mr. Morrison concurred and note that his only reservation is <br />to be sure that whoever does study are thorough -going pollsters <br />and know exactly what they are doing because you can slant these <br />things. He did think the idea has merit and that we should <br />develop the broad strategy in our approach. <br />Commissioner Scurlock agreed that Mr. Morrison is absolutely <br />correct as to the importance of being objective in this study as <br />to determining interests and that you must identify a profes- <br />sional group to come in and truly do this independently and <br />professionally. <br />Commissioner Wheeler noted that this originally was a <br />proposal by Save Our Shores, and it was to take in the City, <br />primarily the beaches and the project area. It was expanded to <br />the entire county mainly he believed because that way we could <br />take funds from both districts. There was considerable <br />discussion at that time about expanding the study and taking a <br />broad overview including baseball and cultural interests as well <br />as the beaches. <br />Mr. Morrison referred to the highly professional study the <br />Beach Restoration and Management Committee had done of the entire <br />coastline in this county and how the whole thing got out of hand <br />with demagoguery and zealots with the result that we asked <br />citizens to make a decision based on their lack of information. <br />He stressed that the Tourist Council was thinking of the <br />requested study in terms of the beaches in the whole county, not <br />just in the City of Vero Beach. <br />Richard B:Lreley, 1622 Camino del Rio, complimented Commis- <br />sioner Eggert on her suggestion of a workshop. He agreed this <br />whole thing started out with very few requests, and now they are <br />lined up. These are tourist dollars, and Mr. Bireley guessed the <br />whole idea is to bring tourists to this community and once they <br />get here, make them happy. Save Our Shores came in with their <br />request and focused almost entirely on sand on the beaches. He <br />did think the idea'of the overall study of people's interests <br />will help the Council to deal with all these requests and felt <br />that there is a need for more definite criteria as Florida law is <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.