Laserfiche WebLink
a little vague in this area. Mr.Bireley noted that he has been a <br />merchant here for 25 years and has heard many, many comments from <br />tourists. Although he agrees we need to take a broad look and <br />let the chips fall where they may, hopefully it will point up <br />that we do need that beach and we need it badly. The comments <br />he hears are from people coming to the beach, and mostly they <br />come to the central beach; they don't go up to the north end of <br />the county. Somehow we have got to get sand on that beach, and <br />he believed we will hear from Mr. Sexton about the survey being <br />broader than was intended. <br />Commissioner Eggert agreed the beaches are tremendously <br />important, but feared if we keep this study too narrow and let it <br />become too politicized, it will not be of as much value as if we <br />had a broader study. <br />Commissioner Wheeler also agreed that beaches are very <br />important, but what brings tourists to any community is water - <br />lakes, ponds, and rivers, as well as the ocean, and he felt that <br />to say when the beaches are gone, our community will dry up and <br />blow away is not correct. <br />Chairman Bird believed the question now is should we broaden <br />the scope of the study. Beaches would be a part of that, but it <br />appears the interest is in broadening that study. He asked Mr. <br />Sexton for his comments. <br />Ralph Sexton, president of Save Our Shores, pointed out that <br />the second paragraph of their proposal says this will be a <br />countywide study. He advised that he wished to introduce Dr. <br />Strong of Florida Atlantic, an international authority on these <br />subjects, who happens to be consultant for Palm Beach County on <br />their tourist matters. Mr. Sexton felt that anything the Board <br />wishes could be included in the proposed study, but noted that it <br />could cost more and they should be prepared to pay for it. He <br />stressed that his group made the proposal and they got the money, <br />but regardless, this study could include whatever is desired. <br />Chairman Bird asked Mr. Sexton to consider whether the <br />entire $50,000 should be aimed at the beach study or if a portion <br />could be used to broaden the study. <br />Mr. Sexton wished to point out that Chapter 161 of the Beach <br />Management law sets out certain things that should be in the <br />study, and they certainly want those things in the study but <br />don't see that it couldn't include other things. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that there is a budget request <br />of $50,000 and a contingency of $20,000, but until this comes <br />back from the Committee with an actual.scope of services, you <br />will not have anything other than a "guesstimate." <br />y � ice• �, <br />BOOK �;j F' GE Did <br />29 <br />