6/18/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

only of a node reconfiguration and primarily replacing node area dedicated for right-of-way, Policy 1.22 does not apply. DCA Objections As referenced in the Description and Conditions section of this staff analysis, DCA's objections to this amendment related to the public facility demand analysis in the plan amendment transmittal staff report and to land use concerns associated with the proposed amendment. It is staff's position that the concurrency analysis incorporated in this staff report adequately addresses DCA's objections by specifically noting that the analysis is based upon the most intense use of the property and by indicating that adopted levels of service were considered and will be maintained. As to DCA's land use objections, staff feels that DCA did not understand that the amendment, as transmitted, was not an expansion of a node. It is staff's position that this report adequately addresses the issues of strip development, local node expansion policies, and separation distances. With the referenced analysis, staff feels that DCA's objections have been adequately addressed. CONCLUSION Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment and has found no major incompatibility between the proposed use and surrounding uses. Since no major environmental issues have been identified -relating to the site,commercial development of the property will not have any significant environmental impacts. It has been established - that the concurrency test for drainage, roads, solid waste and potable water has been met with the proposed zoning. Analysis also shows that the proposed request will be consistent with other plan policies. RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to amend the land use map from L-2 to Commercial and rezone the subject property to CG. 0 -Subject Property — Zoning boundary xx Land Use boundary 149 M0 ONNf 7 BOOK Shu f' MP