My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/18/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
6/18/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:09 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:29:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/18/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JOH 1 S19911 <br />SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROTESTS <br />KOK 83 F'k4kGE60 <br />A special assessment is a charge imposed by the government to <br />pay for improvements to private property which provide a special benefit to <br />the private property. The amount of the special assessment and the method <br />of its calculation are set by the legislative body of the county, that is, the <br />Board of County Commissioners. <br />Florida law holds that the decision of the Board of County <br />Commissioners is presumed to be correct. This means that the burden of <br />proof is on the one protesting to show that the assessment is somehow <br />improper. <br />Anyone wishing to protest this special assessment may find it <br />helpful to concentrate on the following areas: <br />1. An assessment must not be in excess of the benefits to the <br />property. (This would be a violation of the takings clause of <br />the U.S. Constitution.) <br />2. The assessment cannot be arbitrary, grossly unequal, <br />confiscatory, excessive, disproportionate to the amount <br />charged other similar properties, discriminatory, or so devoid <br />of any reasonable basis as to be an abusive power. (These <br />would be a violation of the equal protection clause of the <br />U.S. Constitution. ) <br />3. The assessment must have been adopted after compliance with <br />the notice and opportunity to be heard provisions of state <br />and local law. (A violation of this would be a violation of the <br />due process clause of the U.S. Constitution.) <br />The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry <br />Pinto dated June 6, 1991: <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.