Laserfiche WebLink
with the quality of his water. He wanted to know if the assessment <br />includes restoring the pavement and Mr. Pinto said yes, it would. <br />Mr. Banner said he supported Mr. Graves' suggestion. <br />Leo Cahill, Jr., 1195 43rd Avenue, submitted a petition and <br />spoke of the many homes for sale in the area and the plight of <br />those who cannot afford their assessments. His property is used <br />for agriculture; he intends to keep it that way for 30 years; and <br />felt he will not benefit by the water project. <br />Dan Veteran, 746 34th Terrace, objected to the project. He <br />did not want the water. <br />Charles Garrett, 1180 Apple Way, one of the original petitions <br />in the project, was upset about the three changes in the assessment <br />costs. First, they were told it would be $3,400, then $5,600 and <br />the letter of June 5th stated it would be $5,000. <br />Cal Trump, 1176 42nd Avenue, wanted to see the County fund the <br />cost of the lines and the property owners pay the impact fee. He <br />was unclear about the $9 million the County would lose, and <br />Commissioner Scurlock explained that if the County is not in <br />compliance with the Comp Plan in regard to the urban service areas, <br />the State could withhold $9 million in State revenue sharing funds. <br />Dora Seigal, 910 28th Avenue, submitted a petition, stating <br />that out of the 21 homes in their area, 17 owners are opposed to <br />the water project. <br />Joan Evans, 39th Avenue, asked about the hookup charge to her <br />house, and Commissioner Scurlock explained that the assessment pays <br />for the lines up to the property line. The owner is responsible <br />for bringing the water from the street to the house. <br />Vernon Parker, 950 28th Avenue, inquired about the exact <br />meaning of an undersized lot; he had been told at an informational <br />meeting it was a quarter acre or less. Furthermore, he was told <br />that if there was even one undersized lot on a street, they could <br />not petition out of the water service. He wanted that confirmed. <br />Director Keating described a substandard lot as a lot that is <br />a half acre or less and has an on-site well and septic tank. <br />Valerie Buffington, who owns a lot on Apple Way, felt it <br />unfair to pay for the square footage of the full lot when vacant <br />land owners are paying only for the 150 -foot depth. <br />William F. Fey, 745 36th Avenue in Florida Acres, wanted to <br />revoke their petition requesting water service and read a document <br />addressed to the County Commissioners. <br />John Tippin, representing Grace Lutheran Church at 12th Street <br />and 41st Avenue, advised they were looking for some special <br />circumstance, possibly a 150 -foot depth vacant lot exemption. <br />23 <br />JUN 18 199 <br />L_ <br />BOOK, 3- �,A,, 6g2' <br />