Laserfiche WebLink
Chairman Bird asked if it is likely everything inside the <br />urban service area would receive a residential zoning and <br />everything outside would be agricultural. <br />Director Keating explained the comprehensive plan specifically <br />has a policy that says the County is to promote the continuation of <br />agricultural use inside the urban service area, so staff is going <br />to recommend not changing any existing agricultural areas within <br />the urban service area. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked about the residential zoning and <br />Director Keating advised staff would recommend rezoning it to <br />agricultural designation consistent with the density but any lots <br />that are specifically identified in the comprehensive plan as lots <br />of record will be able to be developed at a size which would not <br />necessarily be consistent with the Comp Plan. <br />Chairman Bird wished to know if the opposite would be true, <br />that is, would an existing house not be non -conforming and Director <br />Keating answered that it would be fine if the house were on a lot <br />of record and, if something happened to the structure, you would be <br />able to rebuild it. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard in this matter. <br />David Feldman, property owner, came before the Board to object <br />to the comprehensive plan amendment as it might affect the property <br />that he and his wife own. He submitted a letter that was prepared <br />by his attorney in Dade County. Chairman Bird suggested, rather <br />than Mr. Feldman reading the rather lengthy letter, which is being <br />made part of the record, he should highlight it briefly. <br />45 <br />JUN 18 1991 <br />tp��T <br />P00K <br />