Laserfiche WebLink
Fr- I <br />' JUN 18 111' 91 Rou 83 r,, E 682 <br />under the compliance stipulation, and they would move forward, <br />but they would rather not do that because they feel they have had <br />a lot of cooperation and have come a long way in working with <br />staff on this. <br />Mr. Watts confirmed that they support the staff responses to <br />the ORC report other than the issue of density. As to talking <br />about what the higher and lower level DCA personnel think, in <br />working with their staff while having the administrative hearing <br />pending, they have learned the DCA staff that has reviewed the <br />County's plan is by and large one man's view of the world - they <br />work in a team but essentially it is one man's work. <br />Mr. Watts went on to discuss what was done in the Brevard <br />County part of the Coraci holding where it is 1/21 and 1/1, which <br />gives them some confidence that if the 1/21 is adopted, the DCA <br />will not challenge it. He promised that if the Board does submit <br />the 1/21 and is challenged by the DCA, the Coraci people would <br />represent the County's interest and defense in working with Mr. <br />Collins and Mr. Vitunac. Mr. Watts noted that in checking the <br />DCA records to find where the population figures and the density <br />caps come from for the 20 year horizon, they have learned that <br />the DCA uses whatever figures the county sends up based on <br />professionally accepted methodology, but they don't even have a <br />demographer on the DCA staff. Nor do they have an economist on <br />their staff to substantiate that their figure of 1.25 coverage <br />won't distort the marketplace, and that figure, in essence, means <br />that for every 4 people who move to the county in the next 20 <br />years, you need to have 5 lots available. Mr. Watts did not want <br />to be too critical of the DCA because he realized they are <br />understaffed and overworked, but he did believe there are a lot <br />more possible views of the world. <br />For purposes of the record to support this applicant's <br />request to come in at 1/21, Mr. Watts wished to point out that in <br />Brevard County this same tract south of the C-54 Canal has been <br />accepted in their compliance agreement with DCA at 1/21 along the <br />banks of the St. Sebastian River and 1/1 in the western part of <br />that land away from the river. The only way to get to that <br />Brevard County land is through Indian River County going north <br />from CR 512 and in so doing, you must traverse land that Indian <br />River County says is 1/5. The County in a lengthy public hearing <br />this morning addressed their plans for utilities extensions and <br />the importance of having everyone participate so the County could <br />build the infrastructure and fill in the gaps, and his question <br />is how can the County run infrastructure up to the Brevard County <br />part of the Coraci holdings through land the County has planned <br />92 <br />