My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/18/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
6/18/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:09 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:29:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/18/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
informed the Board that when he and Attorney Collins were in <br />Tallahassee, they spent a lot of time talking with the DCA about <br />this amendment, and he can personally state that the lower level <br />DCA felt the 1/22 recommended by the applicant was not appropri- <br />ate. The DCA, both upper and lower level staff, did concur with <br />the request as the staff is recommending it right now. <br />Director Keating then suggested the elimination of the <br />following wording included in Page 294 the backup material under <br />Attachment "A" relating to the Conservation Element: "Appropriate <br />infrastructure such as central sewer service and surface water <br />management systems may be required for the protection of the St. <br />Sebastian River ecosystem." He informed the Board that with the <br />changes discussed, staff would then recommend approval. <br />Chairman Bird noted that basically out of the thousands of <br />acres this man owns in this area, we are boiling this down to <br />about a 600 acre parcel where they disagree about density. <br />Attorney Collins confirmed that he and Director Keating did <br />meet with the DCA in Tallahassee, and Walker Banning, who is <br />reviewing our Plan, does agree with the recommended 1/5 density <br />because it is outside the urban service area. Mr. Knave, <br />however, indicated that if Coraci and the County could come to <br />some negotiated compromise, the DCA would listen to it. Attorney <br />Collins felt that actually it is all pretty much up in the air as <br />to just how the DCA would react to this. If we send it up at <br />1/5, they have said that is okay with them; if we send it up at <br />at 1/22 as proposed, we do not know what_.they will say, but the <br />important thing from his standpoint is that they are not looking <br />at the remedial amendments and making a compliance determination <br />based on this particular amendment. They have told him they will <br />analyze each of these other amendments we are hearing this <br />afternoon individually and deal with them individually. <br />Chairman Bird asked if anyone present wished to be heard on <br />the proposed amendment. <br />Alan Watts of Cobb, Cole and Bell, Daytona Beach, came <br />before the Board representing the Coraci interests. He felt the <br />Board has a good handle on where we are procedurally. He stated <br />that if the amendment that has now been separated out from the <br />Compliance Agreement is adopted, they will withdraw their peti- <br />tion for intervention. He noted that the Board disposed of Mr. <br />Barkett's intervention earlier, and if this amendment is <br />approved, he expected all parties represented by counsel in the <br />administrative proceedings will be in agreement that the County's <br />plan should be approved as amended. If their proposed amendment <br />is not granted, then they are still in the administrative pro- <br />ceedings whether or not the County and DCA come to an agreement <br />JUN 18�� � 91 BOOK F'tia ":�a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.