My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/2/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
7/2/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:09 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:31:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/02/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SU L 21991 <br />BOOK PAGE � <br />Director Pinto stated that it is $86,000. There is about <br />$7,000 for some outside surveying, and the rest was handled by <br />staff and is part of their salaries. If we were going to assess <br />this project, then we would add the $12,000 to it, but in this <br />case, it is primarily for the Landfill and will not be assessed. <br />Commissioner Scurlock reviewed his figures once again, <br />noting that he now estimates that this project saved us $69,300. <br />Director Pinto felt there are several ways to look at this, <br />but what it really comes down to is that we are going to spend <br />$100,000 less. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked what we are going to do with the <br />approximate 6,000 lineal feet of pipe the project was reduced by, <br />and Director Pinto advised we are looking at making a project to <br />extend the line west. <br />Commissioner Scurlock suggested that since we have such a <br />low unit price, this might be an opportune time to take advantage <br />of it and put all this pipe in the ground. <br />Administrator Chandler felt in view of what we have been <br />through in the last months and the concerns that have been <br />raised, even though it appears we may have very good unit prices, <br />we should look very carefully at expanding that. <br />Commissioner Scurlock clarified that he was just suggesting <br />going ahead and preparing another project for bid at this time <br />since the prices are good. <br />Chairman Bird asked Director Pinto whether the spread under <br />the bidding process gave him any concern as he personally found <br />the $100,000 difference between the low and the high amazing and <br />felt someone may find they have made a mistake. <br />Director Pinto agreed that in normal times that spread would <br />bother him, but at this time, many companies just want to keep <br />their people employed and get through this recession, and Commis- <br />sioner Scurlock pointed out that this is the same company, and we <br />have the same thing occurring on Indian River Boulevard. <br />Commissioner Eggert wished to be assured that this project <br />is in agreement with our current master plan, and noted that she <br />will be asking this from now on. <br />Director Pinto confirmed that it is - this particular line <br />is not one of the larger lines of the system, but it will service <br />a very important area of the county. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously (4-0) awarded <br />Bid #91-79 for the 82nd Avenue Sewer Force Main to the <br />low bidder, Owl & Associates in the amount of $86,835, <br />as recommended by staff. <br />CONTRACT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.