8/27/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

L AIDC7- 1991 BOOK 84 ou Commissioner Eggert understood Mr. Krovocheck planned to split the property and asked where the split would occur. Director Keating explained the split was to be a linear split that separates the northern part of the property from the larger - part that will include the house. Staff had looked at the proposed split and did determine that it meets the County lot -split requirements and can be done with a one-time split provision without going into the platting process. Commissioner Scurlock was concerned about the lagoon and understood it was designated C-2, which Director Keating confirmed. Commissioner Scurlock commented that a conservation area is impacted by what happens to the adjacent properties. He understood that such an area could not be filled. Director Keating said he had determined it could not be filled; however, there would be certain possibilities and that is if the benefits accruing would be greater than detracting. Commissioner Scurlock discussed the two scenarios, RS -1 and RS -3, and four lots or six lots or a potential eight lots. Taking into consideration the conservation area, if there were six or eight lots, it appeared there.would be filling. Director Keating stated there is definitely the incentive for someone to pursue filling under the RS -3 scenario. What staff feels is the filling would not be allowed by the language of the land development regulation if the function and value would be significantly less. Commissioner Wheeler asked, if the lagoon were filled in, can he get an additional lot. Director Keating responded that staff has looked at that and concluded that, no, they could not get an additional lot. He felt the big difference is that there is incentive for the applicant to pursue filling with RS -3, less incentive with RS -1, or no incentive with RS -1. However, staff felt there is equal probability they will not get it under both scenarios. Commissioner Scurlock noted a reference to 13 utility taps which had been reserved years ago and asked whether the 13 utility taps could be consumed on this property under either scenario. Director Keating stated the only way they could consume 13 utility taps would be with a planned development project which, of course, requires a public hearing; so, while it is a possibility, it not likely at all. Commissioner Wheeler inquired whether there would be a higher net advantage with the lower density, speaking generally.