Laserfiche WebLink
Director Keating stated that with less density there is less <br />but those can be <br />impervious surface, <br />less runoff, generally; <br />modified through our stormwater system. <br />Commissioner Wheeler asked if there would be more positive or <br />more negative effect, <br />or would it be negligible, comparing <br />lots to six lots or eight lots. if <br />Director Keating said it is difficult to tell. „could be He a net <br />this were pristine, it would be easy to tell that it <br />bad effect.ut in, there <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt if fill material is p <br />would be more runoff into the river. <br />Commissioner Bowman stated that biological surveys show a lot <br />of arsenic, which certainly came from runoff. <br />Commissioner Eggert pointed to the drawing <br />depicting RS -3 <br />zoning and asked if the disturbed wetland affects lot 4. <br />Blois explained that the <br />Environmental Planning Chief Roland De <br />is very disturbed; it is marginal wetland. It is the type <br />wetland possibly, <br />of wetland that would qualify for minimum mitigation and, p <br />the fee in lieu. That is why lot 4 was shown. However, it would <br />entail some mitigation. <br />Chairman Bird asked for clarification: from an endinanmcest in <br />impact, with our subdivision regulations and other or <br />detrimental t on the <br />place, <br />would there be a significant RS -3 scenario <br />Krovocheck lagoon to create the six lots in the <br />versus the four lots under,the RS -1. <br />Director Keating said it is difficult to make a dete hanato d <br />like that and say <br />it is definitely more of a bad effect g <br />effect. Considering, however, the amount of alteration which.has <br />erty, assuming that their compliance with the <br />occurred on'this pro p <br />ormwater management ordinance minimizes the amount of be enhanced <br />that <br />st quality <br />goes into the lagoon and requires that its q Y <br />nd given the fact that some of the <br />before it goes in there, a <br />, <br />not providing any benefit, and <br />nuisance exotics are, right now <br />ma be a detrimental effect, and given the fact that we've taken <br />Y <br />these circumstances into consideration and allowethat pmen would <br />of <br />comparable properties in the past, he did not think <br />have a significant adverse effect; not enough to warrant the <br />rezoning.are going to <br />Commissioner Bowman pointed out that because they <br />have fill, it requires revegetation of mangroves. The drawings <br />show docks but no mangroves. <br />Director Keating agreed there is no question there will be <br />docks if there are lots. <br />21 <br />BOOK 84 F'•jvE 10 , <br />AUG 2`' j991 <br />L J <br />