My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/27/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
8/27/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:37:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/27/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.AUG �= <br />BOOK 84 F',°:Gr <br />Chairman Bird noted the property frontage on the lagoon would <br />not be increased under either scenario. The additional lots <br />created under the RS -3 zoning are isolated from the lagoon to the <br />north and to the east. <br />Discussion continued and Director Keating confirmed that they <br />would not be able to develop eight lots without fill. He further <br />commented,that the jurisdictional agencies involved in making the <br />decision have indicated they recommend against fill. Our County <br />policies would not allow a wetland alterations permit. <br />Mr. DeBlois added that fill could occur only if the federal, <br />state and local agencies looking at this request determine that the <br />outcome of this would not be a net loss in the value of that <br />resource, it would be closely scrutinized by all those agencies to <br />make sure there is a net gain and not a net loss. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if there is a benefit to that <br />lagoon, in staff's opinion. <br />Mr. DeBlois responded that staff feels there is a benefit and <br />that is why staff is recommending denial of the fill. <br />Director Keating concluded that the existing zoning is <br />consistent with our comprehensive plan. There have been other <br />pieces of comparable property developed. Staff feels the existing <br />zoning is adequate. Based on all the reasons presented, staff <br />recommended that this rezoning request be denied. <br />The Chairman recessed the meeting briefly at 10:30 A. M. and <br />the Board reconvened at 10:45 A. M. with all members present. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard in this matter. <br />Michael O'Haire, 575 South AlA, came before the Board <br />representing himself and his wife and Mr. and Mrs. John Luther. He <br />restated his argument as presented on May 7, 1991 with additional <br />comments. He brought enlarged aerial photographs, one showing the <br />subject property as it was in 1973 and another as it currently <br />appears. Mr. O'Haire pointed out the peninsula which encompasses <br />his property, Mr. Luther's property, Mr. Krovocheck's property and <br />a tract of land in River Ridge Subdivision which Mr. O'Haire owns. <br />He pointed out other landmarks and emphasized that the subject <br />peninsula is the only ample tract remaining south of the City of <br />Vero Beach that is suitable for residential use and is unchanged <br />because of the wishes of the owners. Mr. O'Haire recounted <br />conversations with Mr. Krovocheck at the time Mr. Krovocheck was in <br />the process of purchasing his property. At that time Mr. O'Haire <br />22 <br />� � r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.