My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/27/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
8/27/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:37:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/27/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fr <br />66 27 BOOK Fr:CI <br />Eugene Calderone, 1455 Pelican Lane, understood land is zoned <br />so that so many houses can be built per acre; in an'RS-3 zone that <br />means six houses could be built per acre. Now it seems this person <br />wants to fill in a lagoon to increase the acreage and he felt this <br />person is subverting the whole idea of the zoning system by making <br />additional land where there was no land. <br />Commissioner Wheeler pointed out that this lagoon is private <br />property. Another point is that the Board is addressing the zoning <br />question. The question of filling in a lagoon would be addressed <br />if and when it comes up. <br />Steve Henderson, attorney representing Mr. and Mrs. <br />Krovocheck, stated he is in total agreement with one exception and <br />that is with respect to the dredge and fill issue. He believed the <br />Board understood that there is a process for deciding whether a <br />dredge and fill permit will be issued, and he stated that process <br />is under way. There are several state agencies involved, there is <br />close scrutiny and a lot of hoops to jump through. Mr. Henderson <br />felt it could be confusing to some people that a lagoon is <br />privately owned, even though it has contact with the Indian River. <br />He further stated that the County will review an application under <br />Chapter 928 of our Wetlands Protection Ordinance, at which time Mr. <br />Krovocheck will receive a fair hearing on the issue of dredge and <br />fill. If the rezoning is granted at this time based on the idea of <br />trying to eliminate the incentive or interfere with the dredge and <br />fill application, that deprives Mr. Krovocheck of a fair hearing on <br />that issue. Mr. Henderson stated he had brought to the meeting an <br />environmental engineer, who has a degree in ocean engineering, who <br />is handling the permitting. If the motivation to rezone the <br />property is dredge and fill, then Mr. Krovocheck never gets the <br />fair hearing he is entitled to under the due process concept. He <br />stated that the Krovochecks are upset by the actions taken by their <br />neighbors and the County. <br />There was further discussion about the diagrams of the <br />property and how the lots would be set up with and without fill and <br />Mr. Henderson said that Mr. Krovocheck is prepared to accept a <br />denial of the dredge and fill permit after a fair hearing, in which <br />case he would change his plan. Mr. Henderson reminded the Board <br />that the comprehensive land use plan was adopted after a long, <br />exhausting process, and a property owner has an expectation of <br />continuation of zoning unless there are compelling reasons for <br />change. He hoped that if, in the future, the County considers <br />requests by neighbors to rezone property, the Board should have <br />preliminary hearings and direct staff to do an in-depth analysis <br />24 <br />7-7 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.