Laserfiche WebLink
�J <br />TO: James E. Chandler, <br />County Administrator <br />FROM: James W. Davis, P.E., <br />Public Works Director <br />SUBJECT: Proposed Increase in Vero Lake Estates Subdivision <br />MSTU Assessment for Road Paving and Drainage <br />Improvements <br />Ref. Memo: James W. Davis to James Chandler dated <br />July 8, 1991 <br />DATE: August 29, 1991 FILE: vleincrs.aug <br />Attached herewith is a copy of the July 8, 1991 staff report <br />on the Vero Lake Estates MSTU Assessment increase which was <br />discussed during the July 16, 1991 Special Meeting held by <br />the Board of County Commissioners at the North County <br />Library Meeting Room. In addition, the minutes of the <br />meeting are attached. <br />At the above mentioned July 16, 1991 meeting, the Board <br />received comments from the property owners in the MSTU <br />Assessment area. Approximately 2/3's of the attendees were <br />in favor of paving and 1/3 of the attendees were against the <br />paving. Seven property owners spoke against the paving and <br />ten(10) spoke for paving. <br />A recent petition signed by approximately 100 property <br />owners was received objecting to the proposed paving and <br />assessment increase. <br />Administrator Chandler noted that if there is a need to cover <br />all aspects of the project, we will do it, but he felt it had been <br />covered intensely at the July 16th public hearing. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing on Vero Lake Estates <br />MSTU and asked if anyone wished to be heard. <br />Jack Cooper, 8940 106th Avenue in Less Pine Lake Estates, <br />opposed the project and the increased assessment. He had not <br />attended any of the previous meetings because the notices seemed <br />to indicate that it was only for Vero Lake Estates. He didn't <br />feel he would receive any benefit from the roads that are to be <br />paved. <br />Director Davis stated that the drainage system that has been <br />master planned and is implemented along with the paving of the <br />roads does accommodate the drainage for the whole area. The area <br />19 <br />