My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/5/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
9/5/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:38:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/05/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
property to the south was considered when the assessment roll was <br />drawn up. <br />Director Davis explained that the canal which runs along 77th <br />Street to the south where Mr. Ansin's groves are located is <br />actually part of Mr. Ansin's Vero Lake Estates drainage district. <br />He actually owns that canal which the subdivision benefits from, <br />and he wasn't included in this platted subdivision MSTU due to <br />drainage divides and basins. There are good reasons why that <br />unplatted land is not included. Mr. Ansin also owns the canal <br />along 89th Street and the drainage divide is the canal itself. <br />His property drains into that canal which he owns. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt the point is that Mr. Cook's <br />property drains into the canal behind him and that canal drains <br />into Mr. Ansin's canal. He emphasized that Mr. Ansin is being <br />taxed on all the property he owns within the Vero Lake Estates <br />MSTU, which is substantial. <br />Melanie Manning, resident and secretary of the Vero Lake <br />Estates Property Owners' Association, stressed that since the $15 <br />a year assessment must go towards road paving, the proposed <br />project would save money in the long run because of inflation. <br />The increased assessment for 2 years would allow the roads to be <br />paved in 4 years instead of 11 years. She further stressed that <br />the drainage plan will be a benefit to the total area. Mrs. <br />Manning understood that when the MSTU was created, Less Pine Lake <br />Estates was not included and that they had begged to be included <br />in the $15.00 assessment for road paving. The whole idea of this <br />was to create a better community, not to hurt anyone. We all have <br />to give and take a little bit, and everybody will benefit by the <br />drainage improvements and by having a higher value on their <br />property. <br />Mrs. Manning asked Chairman Bird if the Board feels this is a <br />fair project, and Chairman Bird advised that the Board spoke to <br />them when they voted unanimously in favor of the project at the <br />public hearing that was held July 16th. <br />23 <br />Ir 6 1,90 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.