My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/23/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
9/23/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:11 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:41:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Joint Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/23/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to bring the tourists. He thought some of the expenses of some <br />events have been underwritten and have been considered part of the <br />promotion of that event. The Tourist Development Council has <br />always taken the position that the entities who sponsor these <br />events must have some means of sustaining themselves and tourist <br />tax money should not be used to carry the operational and overhead <br />expenses of community groups; that the money should be used to <br />bring people into the community to spend money at the hotels, <br />motels, restaurants and other facilities and services that are <br />paying the taxes, essentially. <br />Commissioner Scurlock thought that is a wide interpretation. <br />He felt the cost of the event should be covered by the entity in <br />the community conducting the activity, and the tourist tax revenues <br />should help with the costs for advertising and promoting the event. <br />Commissioner Eggert felt the funds would be spread further if <br />we were doing just promotion in the sense of advertising. <br />Attorney Collins stated that would be a very bright line test <br />and it would be easy to apply. The Tourist Development Council's <br />view is that some of these events create an ambience within the <br />town that brings the people here and the events themselves are <br />promotion to attract tourists. <br />Chairman Bird felt some associations find it difficult to. <br />generate all the funds necessary to underwrite a really successful <br />production which will then bring people here. He agreed with <br />Commissioner Eggert if we are not spreading the word to adjoining <br />counties and other areas, then we are missing the boat on the <br />advertising side of it. <br />Mr. Bireley noted the Board had gotten to the core of the <br />problem. He described it as a "Catch 22" situation in that the <br />advertising promotion is very important, but many of these events <br />would not even happen if it were not for funding bringing in the <br />bands, bringing in* the fireworks, bringing in the concert and <br />herein lies the problem. He explained that OMB Director Joe Baird <br />and Assistant Attorney Will Collins try to hold the invoices for <br />these events to the letter of the law as much as they can, but he <br />thought if we go by the strict letter of the law we could lose many <br />of these events because these activities bring people from <br />Melbourne, from Georgia, or wherever, into the county, especially <br />after we have established these events, possibly, on an annual _ <br />basis. Mr. Bireley mentioned annual events in other counties which <br />attract people from all over the southeast and he cannot believe _ <br />that those counties do not fund a lot of these events with tourist <br />tax dollars. He gave the example of the 14th Avenue Bourbon Street <br />event with the expensive Preservation Hall Jazz Band which was <br />3 <br />SEP 2 3 1991 <br />JU <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.