My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/23/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
9/23/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:11 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:41:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Joint Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/23/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to the County Commission for approval and asked if that Council is <br />ducking its job. <br />Commissioner wheeler said the Council is not ducking its job <br />and explained the Tourist Bureau was created three years ago to <br />promote tourism and to screen tourist activities to provide <br />coordination. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if we should disband that group <br />now. <br />Commissioner wheeler said no and explained that somehow in the <br />process things evolved to where we ended up dealing with the <br />Tourist Bureau and with the Chamber of Commerce as one entity, and <br />with the Arts Council as one entity. Then some of the individual <br />groups under the Chamber have come in individually and some groups <br />under the Arts Council have come in individually instead of making <br />requests, as they properly should, under the umbrella of the <br />Chamber or Arts. Then Indian River County Tourist Development <br />Council was making decisions when they did not have the collective <br />expertise to deal with these individual groups. <br />Commissioner Scurlock thought that would not be a broad-based <br />group if you just have a bunch of technical professional people. <br />Commissioner Wheeler stressed the difficulty in trying to <br />follow an agenda and making detailed decisions without the benefit <br />of a workshop to work out those details. <br />Chairman Bird offered the following procedure: The Tourist <br />Development Council would be given the total amount of dollars that <br />is generated from this taxation. The various agencies and groups <br />would be categorized into, for example, arts, tourism, and would <br />make their requests through these subcategories. <br />Commissioner Eggert felt they may not choose that route, and <br />Mr. Bireley agreed that has been the problem. <br />Commissioner Eggert felt the reason Commissioner wheeler asked <br />the Chamber of Commerce to suggest how an overall committee would <br />work is because an -agency outside the county government has the <br />ability to sit down and talk things over in a way that you really <br />cannot do when you are in open public hearing. They then would <br />bring these requests to the Council for open public hearing with <br />reasons either for denial or approval and all this would have been <br />shaken out by the groups working together. <br />Commissioner Scurlock said the public process means you shake <br />it out in public. <br />Assistant County Attorney Collins advised that if the Chamber <br />of Commerce is making a recommendation on how to spend public <br />money, they are in the sunshine. He further advised that there is <br />another use for the tourist tax revenues: In counties of less than <br />7 <br />BOOKS": <br />r.uL 8 d t: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.