My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/23/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
9/23/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:11 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:41:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Joint Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/23/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
500,000 population the funds may be used to acquire, construct, <br />extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate, or <br />promote one or more museums, zoological parks, fishing piers or <br />nature centers which are publicly owned and operated, or owned and <br />operated by not-for-profit organizations and open to the public. <br />This authorized use has more to do with facilities and their <br />operation and maintenance, which is something other than promoting <br />and aiding tourism. He further explained how, under a procedure <br />with subcategories, requests would go to the Chamber, or the <br />Bureau, or the Council, or the Commission, depending on what the <br />request was specifically for. <br />Mr. Bireley suggested leaving it with the.Tourist Development <br />Council. He felt the need for more meetings and possibly some <br />workshops because he realized that categorizing requests and <br />deciding where the monies would be best spent may not work because <br />the whole thing could shift from year to year. He felt that the <br />biggest help will be setting out the criteria so that an applicant <br />has it spelled out. <br />Kevin Doty agreed the starting point is the legislative <br />directions contained in the statute which he felt were clearly <br />written. He believed the screening process brings us dangerously <br />close to sponsorship or production, and the Legislature did not <br />intend for the County to actively engage in production or <br />sponsorship of these events. The Legislature intended for the <br />County to facilitate, get it advertised, get it out there. We want <br />to avoid the proliferation of a bureaucracy wherein a group makes <br />a presentation at one meeting, then another meeting, then another <br />meeting. If the County Commission directs Attorney Collins and OMB <br />Director Baird to outline strict guidelines, then we can define <br />what the monies will be spent for within the parameters of the five <br />areas of the statute, and the Tourist Development Council can <br />further define the guidelines for our purposes. Mr. Doty felt sure <br />the Tourist Development Council in conjunction with the County <br />Commission can fill the need without creating more bureaucracy. <br />County Attorney Vitunac advised the Commission needs to decide <br />what they mean by "promote." He thought as a legal matter it is <br />not quite as restrictive as some have said. He thought it means <br />more than advertising and probably less than total sponsorship and <br />that it is whatever the Board finds, as a policy matter, promotes <br />tourism. <br />Discussion ensued regarding what might be covered under <br />"promote." <br />Chairman Bird suggested hearing from the public. <br />Eugene Marks, 331 North Grove Isle Circle, came before the <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.