|
there would be no building or shared functional areas supporting the individual
<br />departmental spaces.
<br />As a final thought on the current report, I should also emphasize our
<br />recommendation that the County strive to achieve a 2010 solution to its judicial facility
<br />needs. Assuming facility occupancy in late 1993 or early 1994, a building constructed
<br />to serve only until 2000 would provide too short a period of useful occupancy prior to
<br />substantial expansion. I recognize that this represents a departure from the planning of
<br />the mid- to late 1980's, but I believe that the County will be best served by the longer
<br />scenario.
<br />The impact of the differences between the 1988 report and our -conclusions is a
<br />building about 14,000 square feet larger than was originally anticipated. If there is good
<br />news in that increase, it is that 118,000 square feet will serve the County's needs to the
<br />year 2010. The earlier report stated a year 2000 need of only 104,000 square feet with
<br />growth to 133,000 by the year 2010. (The 1988• overstatement of- net areas got larger as
<br />the planning period was extended from 2000 to 2010.) -
<br />I hope that this brief explanation helps 'to clarify area differences between the
<br />earlier report and the work which we have done. I look forward to answering any
<br />questions which the Board may have at the meeting currently scheduled for September
<br />24th. Meanwhile, please let me know if I may provide any additional clarification or
<br />assistance.
<br />;Since el�y,
<br />Michael F. Thomas
<br />President
<br />Notes: (1) The ADC Scenarios did not include net spaces for Facility Support Functions such as lobby, loading dock, janitorial areas, central vending.
<br />(-2) The ADC Scenarios did not include building grossing factor to account for the exterior skin, public and staff restrooms, public circulation, vertical circulation, fire stairs.
<br />(*3) These spaces would be constructed -to accommodate the 2010 space need. Personnel, furniture, and equipment would be added on an as -needed basis.
<br />49
<br />SEP 4v'
<br />�y�j%. L/�(�"{�� IQrI' A ®'/ a �� ! •y. r o, a (yµ, �� dB
<br />L
<br />Table6.
<br />COMPARISON OF ADG AND PGAUJPA PLANNING STRATEGIES
<br />(Option #1)
<br />Indian Riaer County Florida
<br />ADC STRATEGY
<br />PGAL l /PA STRATEGY
<br />PHASE I
<br />PHASE H
<br />PHASE I
<br />PHASE If
<br />Section
<br />component
<br />Build to 2000
<br />Renovate to 2010
<br />Build to 2000
<br />Renovate to 2010
<br />1.000
<br />CIRCUIT AND COUNTY COURTS
<br />4Z359 (7 Courts)
<br />48,991 (8 Courts)
<br />29,538 (6 Courts)
<br />34,182 C Courts)
<br />2.000
<br />CLERK OF COURT - Administration
<br />1,269
<br />1,458
<br />1,3M -3
<br />1,364
<br />CLERK OF COURT - Finance
<br />6,669
<br />9,450
<br />Admin. Bldg. (4,074)
<br />Admin. Bldg. (4,776)
<br />CLERK OF COURT -Data Processing
<br />Admin. Bldg.
<br />Admin. Bldg.
<br />Admin. Bldg. (2,471)
<br />Admin Bldg. (,708)
<br />3.000
<br />CLERK OF COURT - Courthouse
<br />23,260
<br />31,232
<br />26,854 -3
<br />26,854
<br />4.000
<br />LAWLIBRARY
<br />2,410
<br />3,085
<br />3,295 -3
<br />3,295
<br />5.000
<br />PUBLIC DEFENDER
<br />6,669
<br />9,261
<br />4,979 -3
<br />4,979
<br />6.000
<br />COURT SECURITY/ CENTRAL HOLDING
<br />4,001
<br />6,320
<br />1,961 -3
<br />1,961
<br />WARRANTS / CIVIL PROCESS DIVISION
<br />0
<br />0
<br />2,222 -3
<br />2,222
<br />7.000
<br />STATEATTORNEY
<br />7,486
<br />11,239
<br />9,439 -3
<br />9,439 _
<br />8.000
<br />COURTSUPPORTFUNCTIONS
<br />4,355
<br />5,976
<br />2,565 •-3
<br />2,565
<br />9.000
<br />FACILITY SUPPORT FMC17ONS
<br />0 -1
<br />0 11
<br />6,360 -3
<br />6,360
<br />DEPARTME ML GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE
<br />98,477
<br />127.012
<br />88,577
<br />93,221
<br />MECHANICAL / ELECTRICAL
<br />4,924 6% of DGSF) 6,351
<br />5,315 (6%- of DGSF) S S93
<br />DGSFSUBTOTAL
<br />103,401
<br />133,363
<br />93,892
<br />98,814
<br />BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE (120 Factod
<br />124,081 -2 '.:
<br />160,D35 2112
<br />670
<br />118 577
<br />Notes: (1) The ADC Scenarios did not include net spaces for Facility Support Functions such as lobby, loading dock, janitorial areas, central vending.
<br />(-2) The ADC Scenarios did not include building grossing factor to account for the exterior skin, public and staff restrooms, public circulation, vertical circulation, fire stairs.
<br />(*3) These spaces would be constructed -to accommodate the 2010 space need. Personnel, furniture, and equipment would be added on an as -needed basis.
<br />49
<br />SEP 4v'
<br />�y�j%. L/�(�"{�� IQrI' A ®'/ a �� ! •y. r o, a (yµ, �� dB
<br />L
<br />
|