My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/24/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
9/24/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:11 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:43:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/24/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SEP 2�1. jqq� <br />BOOK 8 4 <br />F'°' .. q,), 5� <br />YI.��C .����� <br />Courthouse to house all the court system and related <br />staff, plus the parking garage, at an increase of <br />2.7 million over the original budget. <br />Chairman Bird was not ready to vote to make this unanimous. <br />He wished to discuss the other options presented whereby we would <br />save 2. million by putting the State Attorney and Public Defender <br />in other buildings. Those options make use of the Annex and <br />State Attorney's building, both of which he believed are still <br />very functional, and he didn't know what else we will do with <br />them. He knew that everyone wants to be in a nice bright, shiny <br />new building and that there would be some element of convenience <br />for the public, but he wondered if these officials really have <br />been talked to to.determine if this is their preference or if <br />they would prefer to be in a campus slightly removed with their <br />own separate identity -maintained. <br />Commissioner.Eggert believed that at their last hearing, <br />they indicated they wished to be all in the one building, and <br />Administrator Chandler confirmed that the Public Defender, the <br />State's Attorney, the Judges, etc., all recommended being under <br />one roof. <br />Commissioner Wheeler agreed that was the case and consistent <br />with what was indicated in earlier meetings. <br />Chairman Bird inquired about .what was planned for the two <br />other buildings, and Administrator Chandler advised that what we <br />looked at when we recommended a consultant do a long range space <br />needs study for our administrative needs for the County was that <br />since there -would no longer be a functional need for not only the <br />State Attorney's office, but the Annex, the old Health Department <br />building, and the old main library, that they be disposed of and <br />the funds to be derived from those properties would then go back <br />in to assist in the overall funding for meeting the future needs <br />of an administrative complex - either renovation of this facility <br />or a new building. That study is nearing completion., and you <br />will see a projection in there on the dollars to be derived from <br />those properties. <br />Commissioner Eggert reminded everyone that the dollars to be <br />derived from the sale of the old library were to go to the new <br />main library, and Administrator Chandler agreed. <br />Chairman Bird indicated at this point that he would give up <br />his argument and go along with the majority. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.