My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/24/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
9/24/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:11 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:43:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/24/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SEP 2 4. 1991 4 /0 <br />DISCUSS CONTRACTING_ FOR TOURIST STUDY <br />Cormnissioner Wheeler reviewed the following and asked that <br />Asst. County Collins address this: <br />TO: The Board - of County Commissioners <br />FROM: William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney <br />DATE: September 18, 1991 <br />SUBACT: Tour=ist Study <br />On September 12, 1991 the Tourist Development Council met to review and <br />recommend a proposed scope of services for the tourism study which the <br />Board approved for funding with tourist tax revenues. The Tourist <br />Development Council was presented with proposed criteria for the tourist <br />study as developed by Sonny Dean of the. General Services Department, and <br />as developed by Regional Resource Associates, a consultant proposed to be <br />utilized by Save Our Shores, the applicant for the tourist tax revenues. <br />The Tourist Development Council felt that the criteria put forth in both <br />proposals was generally similar and directed me to meld the two proposals <br />into one scope of services, with any input provided by the Chamber of <br />Commerce. I have revised the scope of services to a form which I believe is <br />acceptable to either the County staff or Save Our Shores. <br />The Tourist Development Council also recommended by a 5 -to -3 vote that <br />Save Our Shores be allowed to contract directly for the tourist study so long <br />as it included all the criteria required by the Tourist Development Council <br />and the Board of County Commissioners. <br />ALTERNATIVES: ,, . <br />1. Accept the Tourist Development Council recommendation that the <br />applicant, Save Our Shores, be allowed to contract directly for the <br />;? tourist study with Regional Research Associates, so long as the contract <br />"' includes all the criteria required by the' Tourist Development Council <br />and Board of County Commissioners. <br />2. Direct staff to go out for bid under an RFP containing the scope of <br />services attached as Exhibit "A". <br />92 <br />M M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.