10/22/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The paving of the above roads have been completed. The final assessments are as follows: 1) 715th Place Preliminary Estimates Final Cost $12, 921.87•_ - 100% $12, 662.23 - 100% $ 9,691.40 - 75% $ 91686.60 - 75%* (2.79 Acres) (2.79 Acres) $ 3,473.62/per Acre $ 3,471.90/per Acre' 2) 35th Avenue Preliminary Estimates Final Cost $44,039.49 - 100% $32,778.36 - 100% $33,029.62 - 75% $25,075.45 - 75%* (1166.30 Front Footage)(1166.30 Front Footage) $28.32/per FF $21.50/per FF Driveway Costs $ 6,161.00 - 100% $ 41620.75 - 75%** 3) 85th Avenue Preliminary Estimates & 85th Court $196,146.89 - 100% Paradise Park $147,110.17 - 75% (113 Parcels) $1,301.86/per Parcel * This figure includes ** See Assessment Roll each property owner. Final Cost $153,898.61 - 100% $117,732.44 - 75%* (113 Parcels) $1,041.88/per Parcel Driveway Costs $26,864.49 - 100% $20,148.37 - 75%** 2% Tax Collector's fee. for individual cost to The final assessment rolls have been prepared and are ready to bei delivered to the Clerk to the Board. Assessments for 85th Avenue & 85th Court in.Paradise Park Subdivision and 15th Place are to be paid within 90 days or in 2 equal installments, the first to be made twelve months from the due date and subsequent payments to be due yearly from the due date at an interest rate of 9.75�stahl i shed by the Board of County Commissioners. During the public.hearing for paving 35th Avenue, the Board extended the payment schedule to five years. The assessments are to be paid within 90 days or in five equal installments, the first to be made twelve months from the due date and subsequent payments to be due yearly from the due date at an interest rate of 9.,75%. The assessment roll for 35th Avenue, and 85th Avenue and 85th Court show a cost for driveway construction. This driveway construction work was provided on these roads due to the Stormwater Management System and the need to prevent erosion of drives and eliminate the possibility of maintenance problems to dives. On 85th Avenue and 85th Court in Paradise Park Subdivision, some driveways were larger than others and therefore the total cost for some parcels having the larger drives, including the cost of paving and drainage total exceeded the preliminary assessment. In this case the preliminary assessment figure was used as the final assessment cost. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS Since the final assessment to the benefitted owners is less than or equal to the preliminary assessment roll, the only alternative presented is to approve the final assessment rolls. �1 49 ROG� 4 PAGE �cJi '