My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/12/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
11/12/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:11 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:46:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/12/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK ' P,i, `j d <br />Director Keating explained the change in circumstances <br />provided for under Conclusion. He pointed out that although this <br />node is not 70o expanded, this is a circumstance where "otherwise <br />warranted" comes into play due to the northerly extension of <br />Indian River.Boulevard being built on the east end of the site. <br />The Boulevard will constitute a barrier and actually separate <br />this property from other property to the east and essentially <br />squeeze this property between existing medical uses to the west. <br />With Barber Avenue to the north and the Boulevard to the east, <br />staff feels this is a circumstance which constitutes "otherwise <br />warranted." After looking at the other policies, staff feels <br />there is justification for expanding the node. The major issue <br />here is the environmental characteristics of the property. There <br />are definitely uplands on the property and staff feels the Comp <br />Plan's current requirements provide protection for the wetlands, <br />because even if this is redesignated to be part of the node, the <br />particular Comp Plan policies will prohibit development in any of <br />the areas that are deemed to be jurisdictional wetlands and the <br />only development that will be allowed in those areas is single- <br />family residential at a density of one unit per 40 acres. Staff <br />feels that since there are uplands on the property, it would not <br />be appropriate for single-family residential to be put in there <br />adjacent to the medical uses to the west and the Boulevard to the <br />east. <br />Summing up, Director Keating stated that staff is <br />recommending transmittal of the request to the DCA because they <br />feel the County's current environmental wetland policies provide <br />adequate protection, that the Boulevard is a change in <br />circumstance that isolates the property, and that the request is <br />consistent with various Comp Plan policies. <br />The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard on this matter. There being none, he closed <br />the Public Hearing. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved <br />the transmittal of the proposed land use amendment to <br />the DCA for their 90 -day review; approval includes the <br />minor changes to the trip generation rate in this item <br />and in the other items today, as requested by Director <br />Keating, and the inclusion in the node boundaries of <br />the sliver of land extending to the right-of-way of <br />Indian River Boulevard. <br />40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.