Laserfiche WebLink
a <br />fi� calculated and. updated annually, utilizing the latest and best <br />:available peak season traffic characteristics and a1 in Appendix <br />fi I methodolo as set forth in the Florida P Department of <br />Transportation (FDOT) Level of Service (LOS) manual. Available¢ <br />'capacity is the total capacity less existing and committed traffic <br />_volumes; this is updated daily, based upon vesting associated with `gS <br />project approvals..., <br />3a:'Based upon staff analysis, it was determined that 58th Avenue and <br />the other impacted roadways serving the project can accommodate the <br />additional trips without decreasing the existing level of service.;; <br />;- u'Impacted roadways are defined in the County's Land Development <br />Regulations -as roadway segments which receive five percent (5%) or {sk` <br />more daily project traffic or fifty (50) or more daily project <br />trips, whichever is less. <br />f The table below identifies each of the impacted roadway segments <br />associated with this proposed amendment. As indicated in that <br />table, there is sufficient capacity in all of the segments to <br />-accommodate the proposed request. <br />TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION <br />Impacted Road Segments <br />(peak hour/peak season/peak direction) <br />Roadway <br />Segment <br />Road <br />Given•those°conditions, the number of trips associated with this <br />From <br />request was determined by taking the total number of residential <br />units (40) allowed under the proposed land use, applyi:ig ITE's <br />1905 <br />1.0.12 p.m. peak hour trips per residential unit to get total peak <br />60 <br />hour trips, and applying the ITE residential use p.m. peak hour <br />CR 512 <br />inbound factor of 65% to the total p.m. peak hour trips for the use <br />1910 <br />r'to get the peak hour entering volume of trips for the site. The <br />60 <br />same methodology was employed to obtain the site PM peak hour <br />I-95 <br />exiting volume; however, a 35% outbound factor was used instead of <br />540 <br />the 65% inbound factor. Using a modified gravity model and a hand <br />S.R. <br />assignment, these trips were then assigned to roadways on the <br />I-95 <br />network.; <br />- --. <br />:. <br />As a result tof this assignment, two volumes were -obtained for each <br />1920 <br />impacted roadway segment. These volumes represent the PM peak hour <br />60 <br />r..."pr <br />;project volume for each direction for each roadway. Using the <br />°¢ <br />volume assigned to the <br />g peak direction of each roadway, a capacity <br />xf'determination was made for each segment. This capacity <br />S.R. <br />kY 5 <br />tdetermination involved comparing the assigned volume to the <br />A <br />t <br />qtr segment's available capacity. <br />Avenue <br />.ems, <br />"ta'`'F✓.' _ _ ., '.: ,:.., . , <br />i t <br />capacities for all roadway segments in Indian River County are <br />60 <br />fi� calculated and. updated annually, utilizing the latest and best <br />:available peak season traffic characteristics and a1 in Appendix <br />fi I methodolo as set forth in the Florida P Department of <br />Transportation (FDOT) Level of Service (LOS) manual. Available¢ <br />'capacity is the total capacity less existing and committed traffic <br />_volumes; this is updated daily, based upon vesting associated with `gS <br />project approvals..., <br />3a:'Based upon staff analysis, it was determined that 58th Avenue and <br />the other impacted roadways serving the project can accommodate the <br />additional trips without decreasing the existing level of service.;; <br />;- u'Impacted roadways are defined in the County's Land Development <br />Regulations -as roadway segments which receive five percent (5%) or {sk` <br />more daily project traffic or fifty (50) or more daily project <br />trips, whichever is less. <br />f The table below identifies each of the impacted roadway segments <br />associated with this proposed amendment. As indicated in that <br />table, there is sufficient capacity in all of the segments to <br />-accommodate the proposed request. <br />TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION <br />Impacted Road Segments <br />(peak hour/peak season/peak direction) <br />Roadway <br />Segment <br />Road <br />From <br />To <br />SegmentCapacity <br />LOS "D" <br />1905 <br />S.R. <br />60 <br />W. County Line <br />CR 512 <br />540 <br />1910 <br />S.R. <br />60 <br />CR 512 <br />I-95 <br />540 <br />1915 <br />S.R. <br />60 <br />I-95 <br />82nd <br />Avenue <br />1680 <br />1920 <br />S.R. <br />60 <br />82nd Avenue <br />66th <br />Avenue <br />1760 <br />1925 <br />S.R. <br />60 <br />66th Avenue <br />58th <br />Avenue <br />1760 <br />1930 <br />S.R. <br />60 <br />58th Avenue <br />43rd <br />Avenue <br />2650 <br />1935 <br />S.R. <br />60 <br />43rd Avenue <br />27th <br />Avenue <br />2650 <br />67 <br />f1l)�'� RX <br />Fr!ut <br />I <br />