Laserfiche WebLink
M ® M <br />of land. Subsequently, the applicant hired a professional surveyor <br />who confirmed the 122 acre size. <br />Once the total node acreage was established, it was necessary for I _ <br />the staff to determine the percent developed. Again, the staff <br />used the Property Appraiser's information to do this. Based upon <br />tax and use codes, the staff determined which parcels were <br />developed and then had the surveyor calculate the acreage of the <br />developed parcels. Upon field verification, staff found three <br />parcels with inaccurate use codes. In two cases parcels identified <br />as, developed/improved were vacant. Based upon the field <br />information, the staff compiled an accurate list of developed <br />parcels in the node. <br />For purposes of this analysis, parcels were considered developed if <br />they had a structure on them. Using this methodology, the vacant <br />parcel at the northwest corner of U.S. #1 and Roseland Road was not <br />considered developed, and the unbuilt portion of the Humana <br />Hospital site was not considered developed. Considering all built - <br />on properties in the node (even those used residentially), staff <br />determined that the developed acreage in the node totaled 70.9 <br />acres. This constituted only 58% of the node acreage, and since <br />58% is much less than 70%, it indicated that this amendment request <br />was inconsistent with Policy 1.23. <br />Based upon direction from the Board of County Commissioners, <br />however, the staff re -assessed the Humana Hospital parcel. In re- <br />assessing'the hospital tract, staff determined that the site should - <br />have been considered developed. It should have been considered <br />developed, because the site is a single parcel with one tax parcel <br />identification number, was wholly included within the hospital's <br />site plan for development, and has improvements on a substantial <br />amount of the site. By considering a portion of the hospital site <br />as undeveloped, the staff had effectively treated the hospital site <br />differently from other parcels in the node. It is staff's position , <br />that considering the hospital site as developed is consistent with <br />the provisions of comprehensive plan policy 1.23. <br />When the node was analyzed with the hospital site considered <br />developed, staff determined that development within the node was <br />much closer to the 70% criterion than previously calculated. With <br />the hospital property included in the developed category, the total <br />development of the node increases to #82 acres, with the total <br />percentage of development at 67%. Staff feels that this node <br />development percentage is sufficient to meet the 70% criterion of <br />Future Land Use Policy 1.23. <br />- Economic Development Policy 1.10 <br />Economic- Development Policy 1.10 can also be applied to the <br />proposed comprehensive plan amendment request. Policy 1.10 states <br />that, "the county shall utilize existing 3,ndustries as a magnet to <br />attract new development, including support businesses for <br />industries located in Indian River --County and surrounding <br />counties". Generally, commercial uses such as large chain grocery <br />stores will attract support services and ancillary uses (drug <br />stores, personal service businesses, etc), The Publix Grocery <br />Store, is no exception. Currently, the Roseland/U.S. #1 <br />Hospital/Commercial node has attracted a Walgreens, McDonalds, two <br />banks and other personal service businesses to the Riverwalk <br />Shopping Center. The applicant proposes commercial retail <br />development on the property as an expansion to the Riverwalk <br />Shopping Center. This expansion of the shopping center should <br />attract other uses, consistent with Policy.1.10. <br />27 <br />BOOK <br />NOV 19 1991 <br />