1/14/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FF_ BUCK 6b FACE �4 d TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: Obert M. R a id91j,_AIQW Community Develo went irector THROUGH: Stan Bolinil'PAICP Planning Director FROM: Christopher D. Rison Cpv-, Staff Planner, Current Development DATE: January 6, 1992 SUBJECT: The Community Development Director's Appeal of the Planning and Zoning Commission's Decision to Allow the Use of Road Names for the Rosewood Court Subdivision SD -91-11-014 #91090025 It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners gt.its regular meeting of January 14, 1992. Backaround and History: On November 14, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a preliminary subdivision plat submitted by Tashkede Properties to develop a 37 lot residential subdivision. Designated street numbers were initially assigned for the subdivision's roadways, in compliance with LDR Chapter 951. The applicant then appealed the requirement to utilize street number designations to the Planning and Zoning Commission; the applicant wishes to use road names rather than road numbers. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4 to 3 in favor of permitting the Rosewood Court Subdivision to utilize road name designations. (Please see Attachment #4). In the Post -meeting action letter sent to the applicant from staff, staff reserved the right to appeal the Commission's decision to the Board at a later date. Pursuant to Section 902.07(5) of the county's Land Development Regulations, the applicant, the' county administration or any department thereof may appeal an action of the Planning and Zoning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners for its review. While staff has seldom appealed Planning and Zoning Commission action in the past, the appeal authority was incorporated into the LDR's to provide a mechanism for the Board to consider certain Planning and Zoning Commission actions that otherwise would be final. It is staff's position that this case, and the road name/number issue generally, warrant Board consideration. For that reason, the Community Development Department, based upon Chapter 951 standards and a recommendation from the Emergency Services Department that road numbers should be used and assigned so as to maintain the integrity of the 911 -EMS emergency response system, is appealing the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision that the Rosewood Court Subdivision be allowed to use road names instead of road numbers. 12 M