1/14/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r DAN i4 M*2 streets but not with dual addresses. It must be one designation per street. When the County Commission adopted the road addressing system, certain named streets were grandfathered in and the Postal Service accepted that, but some of them are not in the Postal Service data bank because it can only accept one designation. Postal employees simply know that, for example, Kings Highway is 58th Avenue, but at this point the Postal Service wants to go on record as objecting to dual addresses; they prefer the numbered road system. Dean Luethje, Engineer with Carter and Associates, representing William Nyland, the developer of Rosewood Court Subdivision, explained that the Community Development Director's appeal is a financial drain on Mr. Nyland because he has had brochures printed showing the name of the project and named streets. Mr. Luethje clarified his presentation before the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding EMS and felt if there is a problem with EMS, it should be detailed in writing. Mr. Luethje said he did not misrepresent anything before the P & Z Commission. Director Boling agreed that the P & Z members got the impression that EMS had no objection to street names, but nothing had been said by Mr. Luethje to indicate that. Mr. Luethje agreed with comments made during' the Commissioners' discussion that we need to follow the ordinance or change it. If variances are allowed, the criteria should be spelled out so that applicants know exactly what to expect. Commissioner Scurlock asked for clarification on the timing of the printing of the brochures relative to the appeal. Director Boling stated that within a few days after the P & Z meeting on November 14, 1991, he sent an action letter to the applicant indicating that staff reserved the right to appeal the decision of P & Z. Mr. Luethje was not sure exactly when the brochures were printed, but it was after the P & Z meeting. Discussion ensued regarding the dates and timing of the letter and the brochures, and everyone agreed it was important to Mr. Nyland to have the brochures ready for the winter season. Commissioner Scurlock wished to know the cost of printing the brochures, and Mr. Nyland stated it was approximately $8,000. Discussion ensued regarding the importance of the details in the brochure and the fact that no title could be conveyed on the basis of information in the brochures. Olske Forbes, 5324 Rosewood Road, came before the Board and spoke in favor of applicant's request for named streets. She and her husband own property abutting the subject subdivision. She 16