Laserfiche WebLink
_I <br />2 1L�c� FAGE 354 <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County <br />Commissioners approve the following: <br />1. Proceeding with in-house design, permitting and bidding to <br />construct Phase I and II of the project. <br />2. Authorizing the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to <br />execute the attached agreement with Masteller and Moler, Inc., for <br />surveying. <br />3. Authorizing the staff to select and negotiate cost for the <br />Roseland water tower site. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if there is ample capacity, and <br />Utilities Director Terry Pinto confirmed that there is ample <br />capacity in the water plant. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved <br />the 3 items as set out in the above staff recommendation. <br />SURVEY AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />CONNECTION OF COUNTRYSIDE MOBILE HOME PARK TO COUNTY WASTEWATER <br />SYSTEM (Deferred from January 7 1992 Meeting) <br />TO:, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />e ",Pu,, <br />FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney <br />DATE: January 8, 1992 <br />RE: CONNECTION OF COUNTRYSIDE MOBILE HOME PARK <br />TO COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM <br />For some time now the County has been trying to get Countryside <br />Mobile Home Park to connect to the County wastewater system pursuant <br />to the terms of a 1985 agreement which requires that the Park connect <br />when the County brings the system to the Park. <br />Several months ago the Board authorized the County Attorney's Office <br />to effect the connection by legal action if necessary. Negotiations since <br />that date have resulted in the attached amendments under which the <br />Park would connect immediately. <br />The amended agreement requires the County to use some $143,000 from <br />a former escrow account to pay for the costs of connection. The <br />escrow amount was given to the County by the former owner of the <br />Park as partial consideration for the County's entering into the <br />1985 agreement. Staff position is that since the money came from the <br />original developer it would be appropriate to use the money for the <br />benefit of the Park. <br />40 <br />� � r <br />