Laserfiche WebLink
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved <br />Final Pay Request in the amount of $161.65 to <br />Driveways, Inc., for connection of Sebastian <br />Elementary School to the County sewer system, as <br />recommended by staff. <br />EXECUTED FINAL PAY REQUEST IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF <br />CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR ROSELAND WATER TOWER/ROSELAND WATER MAIN <br />PHASE III <br />The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry <br />Pinto dated January 24, 1992: <br />DATE:• _ _ JANUARY 24, 1992 <br />TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATO <br />FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO <br />DIRECTOR OF UTILITY VICES <br />PREPARED ROBERT 0. WISEMEN, P Q <br />AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER <br />BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES <br />SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR ROSELAND WATER <br />TOWER/ROSELAND WATER MAIN PHASE III <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -92 -07 -DS <br />BACKGROUND <br />On January 21, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners approved the <br />in-house design of the Roseland Water Main Project. The water <br />distribution system preliminary analysis for North County completed <br />by Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan, Inc., recommends a 600,000 <br />gallon elevated storage tank as part of the Phase IA County Water <br />System. The system with elevated storage tank was considered and <br />selected by the staff to reduce the required size of water <br />transmission main, and can be constructed at a lower cost. <br />ANALYSIS <br />Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan, Inc., in its North County Water <br />Distribution System analysis report, dated November 1991, states, <br />"The North County System will function with or without an elevated <br />storage tank located in the Roseland Road area, depending on <br />pipeline sizes along US Highway #1/Riverside Drive from Wabasso Road <br />north to Roseland" (see the attached diagram). Selecting the <br />construction of the water tower alternative, the County will save <br />approximately $250,000.00, compared to the nonelevated tank <br />alternative. Although the cost saving will be used to acquire the <br />site in the area, the selected alternative shall provide an even <br />pressure distribution in the North County System. Furthermore, the <br />elevated storage tank will give enough fire protection flow for the <br />business district in the area, without restricting other services in <br />peak demand hour flow. 25 <br />FED 0 4 i9 <br />A <br />