My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/18/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
2/18/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:30 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:07:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/18/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FF - <br />�0OK F'M IJ 5b <br />TO: James Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />FROM: Robert M. Keating, AICPANK <br />Community Development Director <br />DATE: February 11, 1992 <br />SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE REZONINGS <br />It is requested that the information presented herein be given <br />formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their <br />regular meeting of February 18, 1992. <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS: <br />The Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development <br />Regulation Act of 1985 not only requires that each local government <br />in the state prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; it also <br />mandates that within one year of submission of its plan each <br />jurisdiction must "adopt or amend and enforce land development <br />regulations that are consistent with and implement their adopted <br />comprehensive plan". <br />By adopting its land development regulations on September 11, 1990, <br />Indian River County achieved substantial compliance with the Act's <br />implementation requirement. One aspect of making the land <br />development regulations consistent, however, was not undertaken at <br />that time. That involves the administrative rezoning of property <br />to make the zoning designation of each parcel in the County <br />consistent with its land use plan designation. <br />The reason that the rezoning issue was not addressed when the land <br />development regulations were prepared relates to the status of the <br />County's comprehensive plan. Although the plan was adopted in <br />February, 1990, the plan was not found in compliance by the state <br />until August, 1991. During the period between adoption and <br />compliance, the staff realized that substantial changes in. the <br />adopted plan would probably be required to achieve compliance. In <br />fact, major land use changes were made as part of the compliance <br />process. <br />With the knowledge that plan amendments to achieve compliance would <br />result in major changes, the staff opted not to initiate the <br />administrative rezoning process until the plan had been found in <br />compliance. Now that the plan is in compliance, the County must <br />undertake the administrative rezoning process. <br />Once the comprehensive plan was found in compliance, the staff <br />undertook an analysis to determine the magnitude of the <br />administrative rezoning process. This analysis involved a <br />comparison of the adopted future land use map with the County's <br />official zoning atlas. In so doing, the staff compared the zoning <br />designation to the land use designation for every parcel in the <br />County. Through this process, the staff not only determined the <br />number of parcels and amount of acreage to be affected by the <br />administrative rezonings, but the staff also identified each <br />affected parcel by tax parcel identification number as well as by <br />current and proposed zoning designations. <br />26 <br />u <br />_I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.