My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/25/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
2/25/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:30 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:09:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/25/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK &0 f',".lig <br />Commissioner Scurlock concluded that would move commercial <br />zoning 17.12 feet closer to the residential subdivision and he <br />opposed it. <br />County Attorney Charles Vitunac explained the net result would <br />be reconfiguration of the same amount of acreage. <br />Chairman Eggert asked, and Attorney Collins clarified that the <br />item for consideration is whether to enter into the proposed <br />agreement to purchase the right-of-way which would be contingent on <br />the rezoning being approved. <br />Commissioner Scurlock considered it contract zoning, but <br />Attorney Collins advised it is not contract zoning because an <br />agreement to buy right-of-way has nothing to do with whether the <br />rezoning will be approved because that is a land use decision. <br />Chairman Eggert recognized a resident who wished to address <br />the Board. <br />Barbara Bonnah, 5845 23rd Street, resident of Rivera Estates <br />Subdivision, spoke in opposition to the proposed rezoning. She <br />stated her backyard faces the RM -6 property which serves as a 300 - <br />foot buffer between the residential and commercial zones. Mrs. <br />Bonnah recounted raising objections at a Board meeting in September <br />of 1987 when the Board approved rezoning of 4.4 acres from RM -6 to <br />commercial to align the entrance of the subject parcel on Kings <br />Highway with the entrance to Ryanwood Shopping Center. At that <br />time Mrs. Bonnah told the Board that the residents were afraid the <br />developer would take that 4.4 acres and keep coming back for more <br />until the commercial parcel would extend right up to their <br />backyards. If the 17.12 -foot strip is rezoned to commercial and <br />the parcel is resold, she would expect the next developer to use <br />the argument that the remaining 10 acres of RM -6 is too small and <br />therefore not suited for multi -family residential. Mrs. Bonnah <br />described it as whittling away at the residential zoning for <br />supposedly good reasons but, in the meantime, the actual reason is <br />to change RM -6 acreage, which is worth $70,000 per acre, to <br />commercial acreage, which is worth $263,000 per acre. Mrs. Bonnah <br />advised that she had met recently with a representative of the <br />developer and had suggested to him that they could eliminate one <br />building from the site plan in order to provide the required <br />parking spaces. His response was that it would decrease their <br />profit. She also suggested the shopping center could be built on <br />the southwest corner of SR 60 and Kings Highway where they would <br />not encroach on a residential area. Mrs. Bonnah was also concerned <br />about having a supermarket there which will generate noise from <br />refrigerated trucks at all hours of the day and night and - <br />eventually will require a traffic signal for that access. road. <br />56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.