My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/3/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
3/3/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:11:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/03/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
j 319 <br />services, and the 20% is 10%- local and 10% from the State. <br />According to the DOT personnel who we have talked with, that <br />$185,544 is not a given amount you have to spend. It is an amount <br />that is available if your expenditures warrant that, and the <br />expenditures can be for staff and consultant services for the <br />various activities that the MPO needs to take. <br />Director Keating requested that the Board give authorization <br />to the staffs of both the Community Development Department and the <br />Public Works Department to work with the DOT and with the <br />municipalities within the urbanized areas to begin the initial work <br />on the MPO. <br />Commissioner Scurlock understood that we have no alternatives; <br />we must do it, and it is just a matter of how it is structured. <br />Chairman Eggert noted that there are some negative <br />ramifications to this MPO. She understood that the Housing <br />Authority was told that the line was at the North Relief Canal and <br />that Gifford no longer would be able to get certain funds for <br />building low cost housing because it was now in this new urban <br />district. <br />Commissioner Wheeler asked how they came up with $185,544, and <br />Director Keating explained that they developed an allocation <br />formula that incorporated a minimum amount for each MPO regardless <br />of the size and then allocated the rest based on population. The <br />funds are to be used only for transportation planning activities <br />such as running transportation models, coming up with <br />transportation improvement programs and budgets, etc. A lot of <br />what the MPO is involved with is committees and input and making <br />sure that planning isn't done in a vacuum. In addition to the MPO <br />itself sitting as one committee, there is a technical advisory <br />committee and a citizens advisory committee, and some of the staff <br />work involves working with those committees. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, that the Board authorize staff to <br />coordinate with FDOT and the other local governments <br />within the Vero Beach urbanized area to initiate MPO <br />establishment activities. <br />Under discussion, Commissioner Wheeler commented that he finds <br />it frustrating that the State can take the money, attach strings to <br />it, and send it back to us telling us what we have to do to keep <br />the money, especially when we already are doing those type of <br />things. There are additional costs involved with setting up an - <br />24 <br />L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.